Course Outline
Table of Contents
The official course outline can be found on ECLIPS/ECOS, however it is somewhat outdated; we're working on getting it updated. In the meantime, this page contains a more accurate description of the course.
1 Course Staff
Staff Name | Role | |
Johannes Åman Pohjola | Lecturer, convenor | j.amanpohjola at unsw.edu.au |
Zoey Chen | Tutor | zhuo.chen5 at unsw.edu.au |
Raphael Douglas Giles | Tutor | r.douglas-giles at student.unsw.edu.au |
2 Course Details
Course Code | COMP2111 |
Course Title | System Modelling And Design |
Classes | Mondays 4-6PM, Tyree Energy Technology LG03 (K-H6-LG03) |
Wednesdays 4-6PM, Ainsworth 202 (K-J17-202) | |
Tutorials | Tue 9-10:30AM, Quadrangle G048 (K-E15-G048), Raphael Douglas Giles |
Tue 10:30AM-12PM, Quadrangle G048 (K-E15-G048), Raphael Douglas Giles | |
Thu 6-7:30PM, Quadrangle 1049 (K-E15-1049), Zhuo Chen | |
Units of Credit | 6 |
Course Website | https://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~cs2111 |
Handbook Entry | COMP2111 |
3 Course Summary
The course builds on the MATH1081 Discrete Mathematics course, examining the role of Mathematics in Computer Science. The main focus will be on introducing students to formal modelling and specification and how they are used in Software Development. The twin aims are to improve logical literacy skills, and to provide students with a solid grounding in mathematical models of computation.
4 Assumed Knowledge
Proofs, set theory, propositional logic, predicate logic (all from from MATH1081); general mathematical concepts from MATH1131/MATH1231; programming concepts from COMP1511/COMP2521 courses (or the higher versions of these courses where available); requirements concepts from COMP1531.
5 Student Learning Outcomes
At the conclusion of this course, you should be able to:
- Formally specify software systems using propositional and predicate logic, as well as program logics.
- Formally model computation and software systems using automata, semantics, and other logical models.
- Apply rigorous proof techniques to computation and software systems.
- Understand and make effective use of discrete mathematical structures and techniques common to other theoretical aspects of computer science.
6 Graduate Capabilities
According to UNSW policy, graduate attributes are important because the disciplinary knowledge that students develop at university is not adequate in itself as the basis for their future lives. Instead, graduates need qualities and skills that equip them for lifelong learning. These include critical thinking and problem-solving skills as well as communication skills and information literacy skills.
This course also contributes to the development of the following graduate capabilities:
This course contributes to the development of the following graduate capabilities:
Graduate Capability | Acquired in |
scholarship: understanding of their discipline in its interdisciplinary context | lectures |
scholarship: capable of independent and collaborative enquiry | tutorials, assignments |
scholarship: rigorous in their analysis, critique, and reflection | tutorials, assignments |
scholarship: able to apply their knowledge and skills to solving problems | assignments |
scholarship: capable of effective communication | forum |
scholarship: information literate | lectures, tutorials, assignments |
scholarship: digitally literate | lectures |
professionalism: capable of independent, self-directed practice | assignments |
professionalism: capable of operating within an agreed Code of Practice | all course-work, by doing it yourself |
global citizens: culturally aware and capable of respecting diversity and acting in socially just/responsible ways | interaction with your fellow students |
7 Teaching Strategies
Lectures will include exercises where we examine the practice of formulating and proving mathematical properties of relevance to Computer Science. Weekly tutorials aim to cement understanding and provide immediate and ongoing feedback for students to assess their understanding of the course material. Assignments aim to deepen analysis and understanding via additional examples and problems. There are no laboratory classes for this subject.
Assignments are tentatively due at the end of weeks 4, 7, and 10.
If you wish to submit an assignment late, you may do so, but a late penalty reducing the mark applies to every late assignment. You can be up to five days late. Each day incurs a 5% penalty to the awarded mark. For example, an assignment that would ordinarily be worth 8.5/10 will be worth 7.5/10, if submitted 2 days late. Late submission of the quizzes will not be accepted.
If you have special circumstances that warrant an assignment extension (e.g. illness), you need to apply for special consideration through the standard UNSW process. Teaching staff cannot grant such extensions. Please be aware of the fit to sit/submit rule: by submitting an assessment or sitting an exam, you implicitly declare yourself fit to do so, and cannot later apply for special consideration.
8 Assessment
The course will feature the following assessment items:
- A final exam, worth 50 marks.
- Three assignments, worth 11, 12 and 12 marks respectively.
- Weekly quizzes, worth 15 marks in total.
The overall course mark will be the sum of the above.
9 Student Conduct
The Student Code of Conduct (Information, Policy) sets out what the University expects from students as members of the UNSW community. As well as the learning, teaching and research environment, the University aims to provide an environment that enables students to achieve their full potential and to provide an experience consistent with the University's values and guiding principles. A condition of enrolment is that students inform themselves of the University's rules and policies affecting them, and conduct themselves accordingly.
In particular, students have the responsibility to observe standards of equity and respect in dealing with every member of the University community. This applies to all activities on UNSW premises and all external activities related to study and research. This includes behaviour in person as well as behaviour on social media, for example Facebook groups set up for the purpose of discussing UNSW courses or course work. Behaviour that is considered in breach of the Student Code Policy as discriminatory, sexually inappropriate, bullying, harassing, invading another's privacy or causing any person to fear for their personal safety is serious misconduct and can lead to severe penalties, including suspension or exclusion from UNSW.
If you have any concerns, you may raise them with your lecturer, or approach the School Ethics Officer, Grievance Officer, or one of the student representatives.
Plagiarism is defined as using the words or ideas of others and presenting them as your own. UNSW and CSE treat plagiarism as academic misconduct, which means that it carries penalties as severe as being excluded from further study at UNSW. There are several on-line sources to help you understand what plagiarism is and how it is dealt with at UNSW:
Make sure that you read and understand these. Ignorance is not accepted as an excuse for plagiarism. In particular, you are also responsible that your assignment files are not accessible by anyone but you by setting the correct permissions in your CSE directory and code repository, if using. Note also that plagiarism includes paying or asking another person to do a piece of work for you and then submitting it as your own work.
UNSW has an ongoing commitment to fostering a culture of learning informed by academic integrity. All UNSW staff and students have a responsibility to adhere to this principle of academic integrity. Plagiarism undermines academic integrity and is not tolerated at UNSW. Plagiarism at UNSW is defined as using the words or ideas of others and passing them off as your own.
If you haven't done so yet, please take the time to read the full text of
The pages below describe the policies and procedures in more detail:
You should also read the following page which describes some of your rights and responsibilities:
Note that in order for something to count as plagiarism, the document being plagiarised does not need to have a human author. Hence, unauthorised and unacknowledged use of output from generative AI tools such as ChatGPT in submissions may be prosecuted as plagiarism.
9.1 Statement on use of generative AI tools
Artificial intelligence tools such as ChatGPT, CoPilot, CodePilot, and built-in tools within Word are modern tools that are useful in some circumstances, but reliance on them is not a path to success at university or in your later career. Reaching for a calculator to add up 1+1 is possible but not professionally sustainable for an engineer or scientist (or one might say in our educated society at all!), and that is why you learnt to do that yourself at primary school. Likewise, in your degree at UNSW, we're teaching you skills that are needed for your professional life, which is a combination of some things that AI could feasibly do for you and lots of things that the AI tools cannot do for you. If we were only teaching you things that AI could do, your degree would be worthless and you wouldn't have a job in 5 years. You can therefore see that from an academic standards perspective, the output from an AI tool will be below the minimum standards expected for a course, even if you were to submit it (which you should not!). Your ability to complete later assessments where AI cannot help you will also be compromised if you've relied upon AI earlier.
It is also worth remembering what these AI tools such as ChatGPT are: they are only statistical models about how groups of words frequently appear. These AI based tools are not smart, they don't know anything other than how words are often grouped, and they most certainly do not understand any of the content from any of your courses. Some consequences of their word-statistics and non-scientific basis are:
- They generate confident-sounding text that is completely wrong from a technical point of view.
- The text mangles jargon very badly.
- The output gets causality backwards and so often argues completely the wrong thing.
- They generate text that is often very generic, bland, lacking on detail, and not actually very helpful.
- The output is often just a collection of loosely related factual-sounding sentences that don't answer the question that was actually asked.
In summary, the AI tools generate text output that is superficially reasonable, very confident sounding, and very often wrong. We are setting an expectation that our graduates should out-perform AI, meaning that it is a tool of limited academic use in your degree.
10 Course Schedule
Available on its own dedicated page (see sidebar).
11 Resources for Students
There is no set textbook, although the following resources provide useful background reading:
- Eric Lehman, F. Thomson Leighton, and Albert R. Meyer, Discrete Mathematics for Computer Science. 1042 pages, online textbook, January 2018 edition.
- Carroll Morgan, (In-)Formal Methods: How to write programs that work, draft February 2021. (Appendices D.4-D.14, then D.1-D.3, then E.)
- John C. Reynolds , The Craft of Programming (download), Prentice-Hall, 1981.
11.1 Getting Help
Questions regarding the course material, assignments, exercises, and
general administrative questions should be asked on the course forum
(accessible from the course web page), where answers benefit the whole
class. Alternatively, approach the lecturer after class, or your tutor
after the tute, whichever applies. To discuss matters concerning your
personal performance, please send an email to the course account
cs2111@cse.unsw.edu.au
. For identification purposes, if you wish to
send email concerning the course, you must send the mail from your CSE
or UNSW student account (not from GMail, Yahoo, Bigpond or similar),
and include your student id and your full name.
12 Course Evaluation and Development
This course is being continuously improved and we will conduct a survey at the end of session to obtain feedback on the quality of the various course components. Your participation in the survey will be greatly appreciated.
Feedback from the last two years' offerings was generally positive, with the following actionable feedback:
- Some questions in assignments don't have immediately apparent ways to tell if an answer is correct. For questions involving deductive reasoning, this ideally shouldn't be the case and we will keep it in mind. However, note that certain questions, particularly those involving modelling, have no one correct answer.
- There is no textbook for the course. I do not intend to use a textbook for the course, but I appreciate that having learning material in writing beyond the slides would be valuable. I wrote lecture notes for some of the course last year, but didn't finish them. This year I hope to finish more.