(* Title: HOL/MicroJava/BV/EffMono.thy
ID: $Id: EffectMono.html 1910 2004-05-19 04:46:04Z kleing $
Author: Gerwin Klein
Copyright 2000 Technische Universitaet Muenchen
*)
header {* \isaheader{Monotonicity of eff and app} *}
theory EffectMono = Effect:
declare not_Err_eq [iff]
lemma appi_mono:
assumes wf: "wf_prog p P"
assumes less: "P \<turnstile> τ ≤i τ'"
shows "appi (i,P,mxs,mpc,rT,τ') ==> appi (i,P,mxs,mpc,rT,τ)"
(*<*)
proof -
assume app: "appi (i,P,mxs,mpc,rT,τ')"
obtain ST LT ST' LT' where
[simp]: "τ = (ST,LT)" and
[simp]: "τ' = (ST',LT')"
by (cases τ, cases τ')
from less have [simp]: "size ST = size ST'" and [simp]: "size LT = size LT'"
by (auto dest: list_all2_lengthD)
note [iff] = list_all2_Cons2 widen_Class
note [simp] = fun_of_def
from app less show "appi (i,P,mxs,mpc,rT,τ)"
proof (cases i)
case Load
with app less show ?thesis by (auto dest!: list_all2_nthD)
next
case (Invoke M n)
with app have n: "n < size ST'" by simp
{ assume "ST!n = NT" hence ?thesis using n app Invoke by simp }
moreover {
assume "ST'!n = NT"
moreover with n less have "ST!n = NT"
by (auto dest: list_all2_nthD)
ultimately have ?thesis using n app Invoke by simp
}
moreover {
assume ST: "ST!n ≠ NT" and ST': "ST'!n ≠ NT"
from ST' app Invoke obtain D Ts T m C' where
D: "ST' ! n = Class D" and
Ts: "P \<turnstile> rev (take n ST') [≤] Ts" and
D_M: "P \<turnstile> D sees M: Ts->T = m in C'"
by auto
from n D less have "P \<turnstile> ST!n ≤ ST'!n"
by (fastsimp dest: list_all2_nthD2)
with D ST obtain D' where
D': "ST!n = Class D'" and DsubC: "P \<turnstile> D' \<preceq>* D" by auto
from wf D_M DsubC obtain Ts' T' m' C'' where
D'_M: "P \<turnstile> D' sees M: Ts'->T' = m' in C''" and
Ts': "P \<turnstile> Ts [≤] Ts'"
by (blast dest: sees_method_mono)
from less have "P \<turnstile> rev (take n ST) [≤] rev (take n ST')" by simp
also note Ts also note Ts'
finally have "P \<turnstile> rev (take n ST) [≤] Ts'" .
with D'_M D' app less Invoke have ?thesis by fastsimp
}
ultimately show ?thesis by blast
next
case Getfield
with app less show ?thesis by (fastsimp intro: rtrancl_trans)
next
case (Putfield F C)
with app less show ?thesis by (fastsimp intro: widen_trans rtrancl_trans)
next
case Return
with app less show ?thesis by (fastsimp intro: widen_trans)
qed (auto elim!: refTE not_refTE)
qed
(*>*)
lemma succs_mono:
assumes wf: "wf_prog p P" and appi: "appi (i,P,mxs,mpc,rT,τ')"
shows "P \<turnstile> τ ≤i τ' ==> set (succs i τ pc) ⊆ set (succs i τ' pc)"
(*<*)
proof (cases i)
case (Invoke M n)
obtain ST LT ST' LT' where
[simp]: "τ = (ST,LT)" and [simp]: "τ' = (ST',LT')" by (cases τ, cases τ')
assume "P \<turnstile> τ ≤i τ'"
moreover
with appi Invoke have "n < size ST" by (auto dest: list_all2_lengthD)
ultimately
have "P \<turnstile> ST!n ≤ ST'!n" by (auto simp add: fun_of_def dest: list_all2_nthD)
with Invoke show ?thesis by auto
qed auto
(*>*)
lemma app_mono:
assumes wf: "wf_prog p P"
assumes less': "P \<turnstile> τ ≤' τ'"
shows "app i P m rT pc mpc xt τ' ==> app i P m rT pc mpc xt τ"
(*<*)
proof (cases τ)
case None thus ?thesis by simp
next
case (Some τ1)
moreover
with less' obtain τ2 where τ2: "τ' = Some τ2" by (cases τ') auto
ultimately have less: "P \<turnstile> τ1 ≤i τ2" using less' by simp
assume "app i P m rT pc mpc xt τ'"
with Some τ2 obtain
appi: "appi (i, P, pc, m, rT, τ2)" and
xcpt: "xcpt_app i P pc m xt τ2" and
succs: "∀(pc',s')∈set (eff i P pc xt (Some τ2)). pc' < mpc"
by (auto simp add: app_def)
from wf less appi have "appi (i, P, pc, m, rT, τ1)" by (rule appi_mono)
moreover
from less have "size (fst τ1) = size (fst τ2)"
by (cases τ1, cases τ2) (auto dest: list_all2_lengthD)
with xcpt have "xcpt_app i P pc m xt τ1" by (simp add: xcpt_app_def)
moreover
from wf appi less have "∀pc. set (succs i τ1 pc) ⊆ set (succs i τ2 pc)"
by (blast dest: succs_mono)
with succs
have "∀(pc',s')∈set (eff i P pc xt (Some τ1)). pc' < mpc"
by (cases τ1, cases τ2)
(auto simp add: eff_def norm_eff_def xcpt_eff_def dest: bspec, blast)
ultimately
show ?thesis using Some by (simp add: app_def)
qed
(*>*)
lemma effi_mono:
assumes wf: "wf_prog p P"
assumes less: "P \<turnstile> τ ≤i τ'"
assumes appi: "app i P m rT pc mpc xt (Some τ')"
assumes succs: "succs i τ pc ≠ []" "succs i τ' pc ≠ []"
shows "P \<turnstile> effi (i,P,τ) ≤i effi (i,P,τ')"
(*<*)
proof -
obtain ST LT ST' LT' where
[simp]: "τ = (ST,LT)" and
[simp]: "τ' = (ST',LT')"
by (cases τ, cases τ')
note [simp] = eff_def app_def fun_of_def
from less have "P \<turnstile> (Some τ) ≤' (Some τ')" by simp
from wf this appi
have app: "app i P m rT pc mpc xt (Some τ)" by (rule app_mono)
from less app appi show ?thesis
proof (cases i)
case Throw with succs have False by simp
thus ?thesis ..
next
case Return with succs have False by simp
thus ?thesis ..
next
case (Load i)
from Load app obtain y where
y: "i < size LT" "LT!i = OK y" by clarsimp
from Load appi obtain y' where
y': "i < size LT'" "LT'!i = OK y'" by clarsimp
from less have "P \<turnstile> LT [≤\<top>] LT'" by simp
with y y' have "P \<turnstile> y ≤ y'" by (auto dest: list_all2_nthD)
with Load less y y' app appi
show ?thesis by auto
next
case Store with less app appi
show ?thesis by (auto simp add: list_all2_update_cong)
next
case (Invoke M n)
with appi have n: "n < size ST'" by simp
from less have [simp]: "size ST = size ST'"
by (auto dest: list_all2_lengthD)
from Invoke succs have ST: "ST!n ≠ NT" and ST': "ST'!n ≠ NT"
by (auto split: split_if_asm)
from ST' appi Invoke obtain D Ts T m C' where
D: "ST' ! n = Class D" and
D_M: "P \<turnstile> D sees M: Ts->T = m in C'"
by auto
from n D less have "P \<turnstile> ST!n ≤ ST'!n"
by (fastsimp dest: list_all2_nthD2)
with D ST obtain D' where
D': "ST ! n = Class D'" and DsubC: "P \<turnstile> D' \<preceq>* D"
by (auto simp: widen_Class)
from wf D_M DsubC obtain Ts' T' m' C'' where
D'_M: "P \<turnstile> D' sees M: Ts'->T' = m' in C''" and
Ts': "P \<turnstile> T' ≤ T"
by (blast dest: sees_method_mono)
with Invoke n D D' D_M less
show ?thesis by (auto intro: list_all2_dropI)
qed auto
qed
(*>*)
end
lemma
[| wf_prog p P; P |- τ <=i τ'; appi (i, P, mxs, mpc, rT, τ') |] ==> appi (i, P, mxs, mpc, rT, τ)
lemma
[| wf_prog p P; appi (i, P, mxs, mpc, rT, τ'); P |- τ <=i τ' |] ==> set (succs i τ pc) <= set (succs i τ' pc)
lemma
[| wf_prog p P; P |- τ <=' τ'; app i P m rT pc mpc xt τ' |] ==> app i P m rT pc mpc xt τ
lemma
[| wf_prog p P; P |- τ <=i τ'; app i P m rT pc mpc xt ⌊τ'⌋; succs i τ pc ~= []; succs i τ' pc ~= [] |] ==> P |- effi (i, P, τ) <=i effi (i, P, τ')