References

  1. Carlos Alchourrón, Peter Gärdenfors & David Makinson (1985): On the Logic of Theory Change: Partial Meet Contraction and Revision Functions. Journal of Symbolic Logic 50, pp. 510–530, doi:10.2307/2274239.
  2. Andrew Bacon (2014): Giving your Knowledge Half a Chance. Philosophical Studies 171, pp. 373–397, doi:10.1007/s11098-013-0276-6.
  3. Andrew Bacon (2020): Inductive Knowledge. Noûs 54, pp. 354–388, doi:10.1111/nous.12266.
  4. Bob Beddor & Carlotta Pavese (2020): Modal Virtue Epistemology. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 101, pp. 61–79, doi:10.1111/phpr.12562.
  5. Kyle Blumberg & Harvey Lederman (2021): Revisionist Reporting. Philosophical Studies 178, pp. 755–783, doi:10.1007/s11098-020-01457-4.
  6. Sam Carter (2019): Higher order ignorance inside the margins. Philosophical Studies 176, pp. 1789–1806, doi:10.1007/s11098-018-1096-5.
  7. Sam Carter & Simon Goldstein (forthcoming): The Normality of Error. Philosophical Studies, doi:10.1007/s11098-020-01560-6.
  8. Stewart Cohen & Juan Comesaña (2013): Williamson on Gettier Cases and Epistemic Logic. Inquiry 56, pp. 15–29, doi:10.1080/0020174X.2013.775012.
  9. Andrew Dabrowski, Lawrence Moss & Rohit Parikh (1996): Topological Reasoning and the logic of knowledge. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 78, pp. 73–110, doi:10.1016/0168-0072(95)00016-X.
  10. Cian Dorr, Jeremy Goodman & John Hawthorne (2014): Knowing against the odds. Philosophical Studies 170, pp. 277–287, doi:10.1007/s11098-013-0212-9.
  11. Julien Dutant (2016): How to be an infallibilist. Philosophical Issues 26, pp. 148–171, doi:10.1111/phis.12085.
  12. Julien Dutant & Sven Rosenkranz (2020): Inexact Knowledge 2.0. Inquiry 63, pp. 812–830, doi:10.1080/0020174X.2020.1754286.
  13. Edmund Gettier (1963): Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?. Analysis 23, pp. 121–123, doi:10.1093/analys/23.6.121.
  14. John Gibbon, Russell M. Church & Warren H. Meck (1984): Scalar timing in memory. Annals of the New York Academy of sciences 423, pp. 52–77, doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1984.tb23417.x.
  15. Jean Gibbons & John Pratt (1975): P-Values: Interpretation and Methodology. The American Statistician 29, pp. 20–25, doi:10.1080/00031305.1975.10479106.
  16. Simon Goldstein & John Hawthorne (forthcoming): Counterfactual Contamination. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, doi:10.1080/00048402.2021.1886129.
  17. Jeremy Goodman (2013): Inexact Knowledge without Improbable Knowing. Inquiry 56, pp. 30–53, doi:10.1080/0020174X.2013.775013.
  18. Jeremy Goodman & Bernhard Salow: Epistemology Normalized. Unpublished ms.
  19. Jeremy Goodman & Bernhard Salow (2018): Taking a chance on KK. Philosophical Studies 175, pp. 183–196, doi:10.1007/s11098-017-0861-1.
  20. Nelson Goodman (1955): Fact, Fiction, and Forecast. Harvard UP, doi:10.2307/2964684.
  21. Daniel Greco (2014): Could KK be OK?. Journal of Philosophy 111, pp. 169–197, doi:10.5840/jphil2014111411.
  22. Adam Grove (1988): Two modellings for theory change. Journal of Philosophical Logic 17, pp. 157–170, doi:10.1007/BF00247909.
  23. John Hawthorne (2004): Knowledge and Lotteries. Oxford UP, doi:10.1093/0199269556.001.0001.
  24. Ben Holguín: Thinking, Guessing, and Believing. Unpublished ms.
  25. Ben Holguín (forthcoming): Knowledge by Constraint. Philosophical Perspectives.
  26. Frank Hong (in preparation): Uncertain Knowledge. University of Southern California.
  27. Sarit Kraus, Daniel Lehmann & Menachem Magidor (1990): Nonmonotonic reasoning, preferential models, and cumulative logics. Artificial Intelligence 44, pp. 167–207, doi:10.1016/0004-3702(90)90101-5.
  28. Elena Kulinskaya (2008): On two-sided p-values for non-symmetric distributions. Available at https://arxiv.org/abs/0810.2124.
  29. Hannes Leitgeb (2014): The Stability Theory of Belief. Philosophical Review 123, pp. 131–171, doi:10.1215/00318108-2400575.
  30. David Lewis (1973): Counterfactuals. Blackwell, doi:10.2307/2273738.
  31. David Lewis (1979): Attitudes de dicto and de se. Philosophical Review 88, pp. 513–543, doi:10.2307/2184843.
  32. David Lewis (1996): Elusive Knowledge. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74, pp. 549–567, doi:10.1080/00048409612347521.
  33. Clayton Littlejohn & Julien Dutant (2020): Justification, Knowledge, and Normality. Philosophical Studies 177, pp. 1593–1609, doi:10.1007/s11098-019-01276-2.
  34. Annina Loets (forthcoming): Choice Points for a Theory of Normality. Mind.
  35. David Makinson (1993): Five Faces of Minimality. Studia Logica 52, pp. 339–379, doi:10.1007/BF01057652.
  36. Jerzy Neyman & Egon Pearson (1931): Further Notes on the χ^2 Distribution. Biometrika 22, pp. 298–305, doi:10.1093/biomet/22.3-4.298.
  37. Robert Radlow & Edward Alf (1975): An Alternate Multinomial Assessment of the Accuracy of the χ^2 Test of Goodness of Fit. Journal of the American Statistical Association 70, pp. 811–813, doi:10.1080/01621459.1975.10480306.
  38. Jonathan Schaffer & Zoltán Szabó (2014): Epistemic comparativism: a contextualist semantics for knowledge ascriptions. Philosophical Studies 168, pp. 491–543, doi:10.1007/s11098-013-0141-7.
  39. Martin Smith (2010): What Else Justification Could Be. Noûs 44, pp. 10–31, doi:10.1111/j.1468-0068.2009.00729.x.
  40. Martin Smith (2016): Between Probability and Certainty: What Justifies Belief. Oxford UP, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198755333.001.0001.
  41. Martin Smith (2017): Why throwing 92 Heads in a row is not surprising. Philosophers' Imprint 17, pp. 1–8. Available at http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.3521354.0017.021.
  42. Martin Smith (2018): Coin Trials. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 48, pp. 726–741, doi:10.1080/00455091.2017.1381936.
  43. Martin Smith (2018): The Logic of Epistemic Justification. Synthese 195, pp. 3857–3875, doi:10.1007/s11229-017-1422-z.
  44. Robert Stalnaker (2006): On Logics of Knowledge and Belief. Philosophical Studies 128, pp. 169–99, doi:10.1007/s11098-005-4062-y.
  45. Robert Stalnaker (2015): Luminosity and the KK Thesis. In: S. Goldberg: Externalism, Self-Knowledge, and Skepticism. Cambridge UP, pp. 17–40, doi:10.1017/CBO9781107478152.002.
  46. Robert Stalnaker (2019): Contextualism and the Logic of Knowledge. In: Knowledge and Conditionals. Oxford UP, pp. 129–148, doi:10.1093/oso/9780198810346.003.0009.
  47. Brian Weatherson (2013): Margins and Errors. Inquiry 56, pp. 63–76, doi:10.1080/0020174X.2013.775015.
  48. Timothy Williamson (2000): Knowledge and its Limits. Oxford UP, doi:10.1111/j.1933-1592.2005.tb00537.x.
  49. Timothy Williamson (2009): Probability and Danger. The Amherst Lecture in Philosophy 4, pp. 1–35. Available at http://www.amherstlecture.org/williamson2009/.
  50. Timothy Williamson (2011): Improbable Knowing. In: Trent Dougherty: Evidentialism and its Discontents. Oxford UP, Oxford, pp. 147–164, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199563500.003.0010.
  51. Timothy Williamson (2013): Gettier Cases in Epistemic Logic. Inquiry 56, pp. 1–14, doi:10.1080/0020174X.2013.775010.
  52. Timothy Williamson (2013): Response to Cohen, Comesaña, Goodman, Nagel, and Weatherson on Gettier Cases in Epistemic Logic. Inquiry 56, pp. 77–96, doi:10.1080/0020174X.2013.775016.
  53. Timothy Williamson (2014): Very Improbable Knowing. Erkenntnis 79, pp. 971–999, doi:10.1007/s10670-013-9590-9.
  54. Timothy Williamson (forthcoming): The KK principle and rotational symmetry. Analytic Philosophy, doi:10.1111/phib.12203.
  55. Stephen Yablo (2014): Aboutness. Princeton UP, doi:10.1515/9781400845989.
  56. Seth Yalcin (2018): Belief as Question-Sensitive. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 97, pp. 23–47, doi:10.1111/phpr.12330.
Comments and questions to: eptcs@eptcs.org
For website issues: webmaster@eptcs.org