References

  1. Stéphane Airiau, Elise Bonzon, Ulle Endriss, Nicolas Maudet & Julien Rossit (2017): Rationalisation of profiles of abstract argumentation frameworks: Characterisation and complexity. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 60, pp. 149–177, doi:10.1613/jair.5436.
  2. Kenneth J Arrow (1951): Social Choice and Individual Values. Wiley.
  3. Edmond Awad, Richard Booth, Fernando Tohmé & Iyad Rahwan (2015): Judgement Aggregation in Multi-Agent Argumentation. Journal of Logic and Computation 27(1), pp. 227–259, doi:10.1093/logcom/exv055.
  4. Trevor Bench-Capon (2003): Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-Based Argumentation Frameworks. Journal of Logic and Computation 13(3), pp. 429–448, doi:10.1093/logcom/13.3.429.
  5. Trevor Bench-Capon, Sylvie Doutre & Paul E Dunne (2007): Audiences in Argumentatio Frameworks. Artificial Intelligence 171(1), pp. 42–71, doi:10.1016/j.artint.2006.10.013.
  6. Felix Brandt, Vincent Conitzer, Ulle Endriss, Jérôme Lang & Ariel D Procaccia (2016): Handbook of Computational Social Choice. Cambridge University Press, doi:10.1017/CBO9781107446984.
  7. Weiwei Chen & Ulle Endriss (2019): Preservation of Semantic Properties in Collective Argumentation: The Case of Aggregating Abstract Argumentation Frameworks. Artificial Intelligence 269, pp. 27–48, doi:10.1016/j.artint.2018.10.003.
  8. Sylvie Coste-Marquis, Caroline Devred, Sébastien Konieczny, Marie-Christine Lagasquie-Schiex & Pierre Marquis (2007): On The Merging of Dung's Argumentation Systems. Artificial Intelligence 171(10-15), pp. 730–753, doi:10.1016/j.artint.2007.04.012.
  9. Jérôme Delobelle, Adrian Haret, Sébastien Konieczny, Jean-Guy Mailly, Julien Rossit & Stefan Woltran (2016): Merging of Abstract Argumentation Frameworks. Proceedings of the 2016 Knowledge Representation (KR), pp. 33–42.
  10. Jérôme Delobelle, Sébastien Konieczny & Srdjan Vesic (2018): On The Aggregation of Argumentation Frameworks: Operators and Postulates. Journal of Logic and Computation 28(7), pp. 1671–1699, doi:10.1093/logcom/exy023.
  11. Phan Minh Dung (1995): On the Acceptability of Arguments and its Fundamental Role in Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Logic Programming and n-Person Games. Artificial Intelligence 77(2), pp. 321–357, doi:10.1016/0004-3702(94)00041-x.
  12. Paul E Dunne, Anthony Hunter, Peter McBurney, Simon Parsons & Michael Wooldridge (2011): Weighted Argument Systems: Basic Definitions, Algorithms, and Complexity Results. Artificial Intelligence 175(2), pp. 457–486, doi:10.1016/j.artint.2010.09.005.
  13. Paul E Dunne, Pierre Marquis & Michael Wooldridge (2012): Argument Aggregation: Basic Axioms and Complexity Results.. Proceedings of the Coference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA), pp. 129–140.
  14. Paul E. Dunne, Pierre Marquis & Michael Wooldridge (2012): Argument Aggregation: Basic Axioms and Complexity Results. In: Computational Models of Argument, pp. 129–140.
  15. Ulle Endriss (2016): Judgment aggregation. In: F Brandt, V Conitzer, U Endriss, J Lang & A. D Procaccia: Handbook of Computational Social Choice. Cambridge University Press, doi:10.1017/cbo9781107446984.018.
  16. Ulle Endriss & Umberto Grandi (2014): Binary Aggregation by Selection of the Most Representative Voter. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), pp. 668–674.
  17. Ulle Endriss & Umberto Grandi (2014): Collective Rationality in Graph Aggregation.. In: 21st European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI), pp. 291–296.
  18. Ulle Endriss & Umberto Grandi (2017): Graph Aggregation. Artificial Intelligence 245, pp. 86–114, doi:10.1016/j.artint.2017.01.001.
  19. Patricia Everaere, Sébastien Konieczny & Pierre Marquis (2017): An Introduction to Belief Merging and its Links with Judgment Aggregation. In: Ulle Endriss: Trends in Computational Social Choice, chapter 7. AI Access, pp. 123–143.
  20. Xiuyi Fan & Francesca Toni (2015): On Computing Explanations in Argumentation. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), pp. 1496–1502.
  21. Allan Gibbard (1973): Manipulation of Voting Schemes: a General Result. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, pp. 587–601, doi:10.2307/1914083.
  22. Davide Grossi & Gabriella Pigozzi (2014): Judgment Aggregation: a Primer. Synthesis Lectures on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning 8(2), pp. 1–151, doi:10.2200/S00559ED1V01Y201312AIM027.
  23. Souhila Kaci & Leendert van der Torre (2008): Preference-based argumentation: Arguments supporting multiple values. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 48(3), pp. 730–751, doi:10.1016/j.ijar.2007.07.005.
  24. Grzegorz Lisowski (2018): Preventing Manipulation in Aggregating Value-Based Argumentation Frameworks. Universiteit Van Amsterdam.
  25. Grzegorz Lisowski, Sylvie Doutre & Umberto Grandi (2018): Preventing Manipulation in Aggregating Audiences in Value-Based Argumentation Frameworks. In: Proceedings of International Workshop on Systems and Algorithms for Formal Argumentation (SAFA 2018), pp. 48–59.
  26. Paul-Amaury Matt & Francesca Toni (2008): A Game-Theoretic Measure of Argument Strength for Abstract Argumentation. In: Logics in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 285–297, doi:10.1007/BF01448847.
  27. Tim Miller (2019): Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights From the Social Sciences. Artificial Intelligence 267, pp. 1 – 38, doi:10.1016/j.artint.2018.07.007.
  28. Sanjay Modgil (2009): Reasoning About Preferences in Argumentation Frameworks. Artificial Intelligence 173(9-10), pp. 901–934, doi:10.1016/j.artint.2009.02.001.
  29. Chaim Perelman (1971): The New Rhetoric. In: Pragmatics of Natural Languages. Springer, pp. 145–149, doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1713-8_8.
  30. Fuan Pu, Jian Luo, Yulai Zhang & Guiming Luo (2013): Social Welfare Semantics for Value-Based Argumentation Framework. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Knowledge, Science, Engineering and Management. Springer, pp. 76–88.
  31. Iyad Rahwan & Fernando Tohmé (2010): Collective Argument Evaluation as Judgement Aggregation. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 417–424.
  32. Mark Allen Satterthwaite (1975): Strategy-Proofness and Arrow's Conditions: Existence and Correspondence Theorems for Voting Procedures and Social Welfare Functions. Journal of Economic Theory 10(2), pp. 187–217, doi:10.1016/0022-0531(75)90050-2.
Comments and questions to: eptcs@eptcs.org
For website issues: webmaster@eptcs.org