References

  1. S. Airiau, E. Bonzon, U. Endriss, N. Maudet & J. Rossit (2016): Rationalisation of Profiles of Abstract Argumentation Frameworks. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS).
  2. K.J. Arrow, A.K. Sen & K. Suzumura (2002): Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare. North-Holland.
  3. K.J. Arrow (1963): Social Choice and Individual Values, 2nd edition. John Wiley and Sons. First edition published in 1951.
  4. P. Besnard & A. Hunter (2008): Elements of Argumentation. MIT Press, doi:10.7551/mitpress/9780262026437.001.0001.
  5. G.M. Bodanza, F.A. Tohmé & M.R. Auday (2017): Collective Argumentation: A Survey of Aggregation Issues around Argumentation Frameworks. Argument & Computation 8(1), pp. 1–34, doi:10.3233/AAC-160014.
  6. M. Caminada (2006): Semi-stable Semantics. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Computational Model of Argument (COMMA). IOS Press.
  7. M. Caminada & G. Pigozzi (2011): On Judgment Aggregation in Abstract Argumentation. Journal of Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems 22(1), pp. 64–102, doi:10.1007/s10458-009-9116-7.
  8. S. Coste-Marquis, C. Devred, S. Konieczny, M.-C. Lagasquie-Schiex & P. Marquis (2007): On the Merging of Dung's Argumentation Systems. Artificial Intelligence 171(10–15), pp. 730–753, doi:10.1016/j.artint.2007.04.012.
  9. J. Delobelle, S. Konieczny & S. Vesic (2015): On the Aggregation of Argumentation Frameworks. In: Proceedings of the 24th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI).
  10. F. Dietrich & C. List (2007): Judgment Aggregation by Quota Rules: Majority Voting Generalized. Journal of Theoretical Politics 19(4), pp. 391–424, doi:10.1177/0951629807080775.
  11. P.M. Dung (1995): On the Acceptability of Arguments and its Fundamental Role in Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Logic Programming and n-Person Games. Artificial Intelligence 77(2), pp. 321–358, doi:10.1016/0004-3702(94)00041-X.
  12. P.M. Dung, P. Mancarella & F. Toni (2007): Computing Ideal Sceptical Argumentation. Artificial Intelligence 171(10), pp. 642–674, doi:10.1016/j.artint.2007.05.003.
  13. P.E. Dunne, P. Marquis & M. Wooldridge (2012): Argument Aggregation: Basic Axioms and Complexity Results. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA). IOS Press, doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-111-3-129.
  14. U. Endriss & U. Grandi (2017): Graph Aggregation. Artificial Intelligence 245, pp. 86–114, doi:10.1016/j.artint.2017.01.001.
  15. U. Endriss, U. Grandi & D. Porello (2012): Complexity of Judgment Aggregation. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research (JAIR) 45, pp. 481–514, doi:10.1613/jair.3708.
  16. W. Gaertner (2006): A Primer in Social Choice Theory. LSE Perspectives in Economic Analysis. Oxford University Press, doi:10.1007/s00355-007-0273-9.
  17. D. Grossi & G. Pigozzi (2014): Judgment Aggregation: A Primer. Synthesis Lectures on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, doi:10.2200/S00559ED1V01Y201312AIM027.
  18. E. Hemaspaandra, H. Spakowski & J. Vogel (2005): The Complexity of Kemeny Elections. Theoretical Computer Science 349(3), pp. 382–391, doi:10.1016/j.tcs.2005.08.031.
  19. S. Konieczny, J. Lang & P. Marquis (2004): DA^2 Merging Operators. Artificial Intelligence 157(1-2), pp. 49–79, doi:10.1016/j.artint.2004.04.008.
  20. C. List & P. Pettit (2002): Aggregating Sets of Judgments: An Impossibility Result. Economics and Philosophy 18(1), pp. 89–110, doi:10.1017/S0266267102001098.
  21. I. McLean & A.B. Urken (1995): Classics of Social Choice. University of Michigan Press, doi:10.3998/mpub.12736.
  22. S. Modgil, N. Oren & F. Toni (2012): Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Theory and Applications of Formal Argumentation (TAFA). Springer-Verlag, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-29184-5.
  23. I. Rahwan & G.R. Simari (2009): Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence. Springer-Verlag, doi:10.1007/978-0-387-98197-0.
  24. I. Rahwan & F.A. Tohmé (2010): Collective Argument Evaluation as Judgement Aggregation. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS).
  25. F.A. Tohmé, G.A. Bodanza & G.R. Simari (2008): Aggregation of Attack Relations: A Social-choice Theoretical Analysis of Defeasibility Criteria. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Foundations of Information and Knowledge Systems (FoIKS). Springer-Verlag, doi:10.1007/978-3-540-77684-0_4.

Comments and questions to: eptcs@eptcs.org
For website issues: webmaster@eptcs.org