Ronald J Allen (2010):
No Plausible Alternative to a Plausible Story of Guilt as the Rule of Decision in Criminal Cases.
In: Larry Laudan Juan Cruz: Proof and standards of proof in the law.
Northwestern University School of Law,
pp. 10–27.
Ronald J Allen & Michael S Pardo (2007):
The problematic value of mathematical models of evidence.
The Journal of Legal Studies 36(1),
pp. 107–140,
doi:10.1086/508269.
Jacob Bernoulli (1713):
Ars conjectandi.
Jonathan L. Cohen (1977):
The probable and the provable.
Oxford University Press,
doi:10.2307/2219193.
L Jonathan Cohen (1981):
Subjective Probability and the Paradox of the Gatecrasher.
Arizona State Law Journal,
pp. 627–634.
Mary Dant (1988):
Gambling on the truth: the use of purely statistical evidence as a basis for civil liability.
Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems 22,
pp. 31–70.
Marcello Di Bello (2013):
Statistics and Probability in Criminal Trials.
University of Stanford.
Susan Haack (2014):
Evidence Matters: Science, Proof, and Truth in the Law.
Cambridge University Press,
doi:10.1017/CBO9781139626866.
Susan Haack (2014):
Legal probabilism: an epistemological dissent.
In: Haack2014-HAAEMS.
Cambridge University Press,
pp. 47–77.
David Kaye (1979):
The Paradox of the Gatecrasher and Other Stories.
Arizona State Law Journal,
pp. 101–110.
François Lepage (2012):
Partial Probability Functions and Intuitionistic Logic.
Bulletin of the Section of Logic 41(3/4),
pp. 173–184.
François Lepage & Charles Morgan (2003):
Probabilistic Canonical Models for Partial Logics.
Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 44(3),
pp. 125–138,
doi:10.1305/ndjfl/1091030851.
Charles R. Nesson (1979):
Reasonable doubt and permissive inferences: The value of complexity.
Harvard Law Review 92(6),
pp. 1187–1225,
doi:10.2307/1340444.
Nancy Pennington & Reid Hastie (1992):
Explaining the evidence: Tests of the Story Model for juror decision making..
Journal of personality and social psychology 62(2),
pp. 189–204,
doi:10.1037/0022-3514.62.2.189.
Nancy Pennington & Ried Hastie (1991):
A cognitive theory of juror decision making: The story model.
Cardozo Law Review 13,
pp. 519–557.
Laurence H Tribe (1971):
A Further Critique of Mathematical Proof.
Harvard Law Review 84,
pp. 1810–1820,
doi:10.2307/1339570.
Laurence H Tribe (1971):
Trial by mathematics: Precision and ritual in the legal process.
Harvard Law Review 84(6),
pp. 1329–1393,
doi:10.2307/1339610.
Barbara D. Underwood (1977):
The thumb on the scale of justice: Burdens of persuasion in criminal cases.
Yale Law Journal 86(7),
pp. 1299–1348,
doi:10.2307/795788.
Gary L Wells (1992):
Naked statistical evidence of liability: Is subjective probability enough?.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 62(5),
pp. 739–752,
doi:10.1037/0022-3514.62.5.739.
eptcs@eptcs.org