References

  1. Johan van Benthem (2008): Logical Dynamics Meets Logical Pluralism?. Australasian Journal of Logic 6, pp. 182–209.
  2. Johan van Benthem (2011): Logical Dynamics of Information and Interaction. Cambridge University Press, doi:10.1017/CBO9780511974533.
  3. Patrick Blackburn, Maarten de Rijke & Yde Venema (2001): Modal Logic. Cambridge University Press, doi:10.1017/CBO9781107050884.
  4. Justin Bledin (2014): Logic Informed. Mind 123(490), pp. 277–316, doi:10.1093/mind/fzu073.
  5. Hans van Ditmarsch, Wiebe van der Hoek & Barteld Kooi (2008): Dynamic Epistemic Logic. Springer, doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-5839-4.
  6. Wesley H. Holliday & Thomas F. Icard, III (2010): Moorean Phenomena in Epistemic Logic. In: L. Beklemishev, V. Goranko & V. Shehtman: Advances in Modal Logic 8. College Publications, pp. 178–199.
  7. Wesley H. Holliday & Thomas F. Icard, III (2013): Measure semantics and qualitative semantics for epistemic modals. In: T. Snider: Proceedings of SALT 23. LSA and CLC Publications, pp. 514–534, doi:10.3765/salt.v23i0.2670.
  8. Wesley H. Holliday & Thomas F. Icard, III (Forthcoming): Axiomatization in the Meaning Sciences. In: D. Ball & B. Rabern: The Science of Meaning. Oxford University Press.
  9. Niko Kolodny & John MacFarlane (2010): Ifs and Oughts. Journal of Philosophy 107, pp. 115–143, doi:10.5840/jphil2010107310.
  10. Carsten Lutz (2006): Complexity and succinctness of public announcement logic. In: P. Stone & G. Weiss: Proceedings of the Fifth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 06). ACM, pp. 137–143, doi:10.1145/1160633.1160657.
  11. Brian McLaughlin & Karen Bennett (2014): Supervenience. In: E. N. Zalta: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, spring 2014 edition. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
  12. Moritz Schulz (2010): Epistemic modals and informational consequence. Synthese 174(3), pp. 385–395, doi:10.1007/s11229-009-9461-8.
  13. Jouko Väänänen (2008): Modal Dependence Logic. In: K. R. Apt & R. van Rooij: New Perspectives on Games and Interaction, Texts in Logic and Games 4. Amsterdam University Press, pp. 237–254, doi:10.5117/9789089640574.
  14. Malte Willer (2012): A Remark on Iffy Oughts. The Journal of Philosophy 109(7), pp. 449–461, doi:10.5840/jphil2012109719.
  15. Seth Yalcin (2007): Epistemic Modals. Mind 116(464), pp. 983–1026, doi:10.1093/mind/fzm983.
  16. Seth Yalcin (2012): A Counterexample to Modus Tollens. Journal of Philosophical Logic 41(6), pp. 1001–1024, doi:10.1007/s10992-012-9228-4.

Comments and questions to: eptcs@eptcs.org
For website issues: webmaster@eptcs.org