References

  1. M. Allais (1953): Le comportement de l'homme rationnel devant le risque: Critique des postulats et axiomes de l'école Américaine. Econometrica 21, pp. 503–546, doi:10.2307/1907921.
  2. Y. Azrieli, C. P. Chambers & P. J. Healy (2012): Incentives in experiments: A theoretical analysis. Working paper.
  3. M. Bacharach & D. O. Stahl (2000): Variable-frame level-n theory. Games and Economic Behavior 32(2), pp. 220–246, doi:10.1006/game.2000.0796.
  4. D. Balkenborg & R. Nagel (2016): An Experiment on Forward vs. Backward Induction: How Fairness and Level k Reasoning Matter. German Economic Review 17(3), pp. 378–408, doi:10.1111/geer.12099.
  5. P. Battigalli (1996): Strategic rationality orderings and the best rationalizability principle. Games and Economic Behavior 13, pp. 178–200, doi:10.1006/game.1996.0033.
  6. P. Battigalli (1997): On rationalizability in extensive games. Journal of Economic Theory 74, pp. 40–61, doi:10.1006/jeth.1996.2252.
  7. G. Bergwerff, B. Meijering, J. Szymanik, R. Verbrugge & S. Wierda (2014): Computational and algorithmic models of strategies in turn-based games. In: Proceedings of the 36th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 1778–1783.
  8. G. P. Cachon & C. Camerer (1996): Loss-avoidance and forward induction in experimental coordination games. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 111(1), pp. 165–94, doi:10.2307/2946661.
  9. C. F. Camerer, T.-H. Ho & J.-K. Chong (2004): A cognitive hierarchy model of games. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 119(3), pp. 861–898, doi:10.1162/0033553041502225.
  10. J. Chen & S. Micali (2011): The robustness of extensive-form rationalizability. Working paper.
  11. J. Chen & S. Micali (2013): The order independence of iterated dominance in extensive games. Theoretical Economics 8, pp. 125–163, doi:10.3982/TE942.
  12. N. Chlaß & A. Perea (2016): How do people reason in dynamic games?. Beiträge zur Jahrestagung des Vereins für Socialpolitik 2016: Demographischer Wandel - Session: Economic Theory and Personality, No. A04-V2.
  13. M. A. Costa-Gomes & V. P. Crawford (2006): Cognition and behavior in two-person guessing games: An experimental study. The American Economic Review 96(5), pp. 1737–1768, doi:10.1257/aer.96.5.1737.
  14. M. A. Costa-Gomes, V. P. Crawford & B. Broseta (2001): Cognition and behavior in normal-form games: An experimental study. Econometrica 69(5), pp. 1193–1235, doi:10.1111/1468-0262.00239.
  15. V. P. Crawford, M. A. Costa-Gomes & N. Iriberri (2013): Structural models of nonequilibrium strategic thinking: Theory, evidence, and applications. Journal of Economic Literature 51(1), pp. 5–62, doi:10.1257/jel.51.1.5.
  16. A. M. Evans & J. I. Krueger (2011): Elements of trust: Risk and perspective-taking. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 47(1), pp. 171–177, doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.08.007.
  17. A. M. Evans & J. I. Krueger (2014): Outcomes and expectations in dilemmas of trust. Judgment and Decision making 9(2), pp. 90.
  18. L. Flobbe, R. Verbrugge, P. Hendriks & I. Krämer (2008): Children's Application of Theory of Mind in Reasoning and Language. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, doi:10.1007/s10849-008-9064-7. Special issue on formal models for real people, edited by M. Counihan.
  19. S. Ghosh, A. Heifetz & R. Verbrugge (2015): Do players reason by forward induction in dynamic perfect information games?. In: R. Ramanujam: Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015., EPTCS 215, pp. 159–175, doi:10.4204/EPTCS.215.12. Available at https://doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.215.12.
  20. S. Ghosh, B. Meijering & R. Verbrugge (2014): Strategic Reasoning: Building Cognitive Models from Logical Formulas. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 23(1), pp. 1–29, doi:10.1007/s10849-014-9196-x.
  21. S. Ghosh & R. Verbrugge (2017): Studying strategies and types of players: Experiments, logics and cognitive models. Synthese, pp. 1–43, doi:10.1007/s11229-017-1338-7.
  22. D. Gill & V. Prowse (2016): Cognitive ability, character skills, and learning to play equilibrium: A level-k analysis. Journal of Political Economy 124(6), pp. 1619–1676, doi:10.1086/688849.
  23. J. K. Goeree & Ch. A. Holt (2004): A model of noisy introspection. Games and Economic Behavior 46(2), pp. 365–382, doi:10.1016/S0899-8256(03)00145-3.
  24. P. J. Healy (2016): Epistemic experiments: Utilities, beliefs, and irrational play. Available at http://healy.econ.ohio-state.edu/present/Healy-EpistemicPresentation90min.pdf. Unpublished presentation.
  25. T. Hedden & J. Zhang (2002): What do you think I think you think?: Strategic reasoning in matrix games. Cognition 85(1), pp. 1–36, doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00054-9.
  26. A. Heifetz & A. Perea (2015): On the outcome equivalence of backward induction and extensive form rationalizability. International Journal of Game Theory 44(1), pp. 37–59, doi:10.1007/s00182-014-0418-x.
  27. S. Huck & W. Müller (2005): Burning money and (pseudo) first-mover advantages: An experimental study on forward induction. Games and Economic Behavior 51(1), pp. 109–127, doi:10.1016/j.geb.2004.03.006.
  28. T. Kawagoe & H. Takizawa (2012): Level-k analysis of experimental centipede games. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 82(2), pp. 548–566, doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2012.03.010.
  29. A. L. McCutcheon (1987): Latent Class Analysis. Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences 07-064. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA, doi:10.4135/9781412984713.
  30. R. D. McKelvey & T. R. Palfrey (1992): An experimental study of the centipede game. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, pp. 803–836, doi:10.2307/2951567.
  31. R. D. McKelvey & T. R. Palfrey (1995): Quantal response equilibria for normal form games. Games and Economic Behavior 10(1), pp. 6–38, doi:10.1006/game.1995.1023.
  32. B. Meijering, L. van Maanen, H. van Rijn & R. Verbrugge (2010): The facilitative effect of context on second-order social reasoning. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 1423–1428.
  33. B. Meijering, H. van Rijn, N. A. Taatgen & R. Verbrugge (2011): I do know what you think I think: Second-order theory of mind in strategic games is not that difficult. In: Proc. 33rd Annual Conf. Cognitive Science Society, pp. 2486–2491.
  34. B. Meijering, H. van Rijn, N.A. Taatgen & R. Verbrugge (2012): What eye movements can tell about theory of mind in a strategic game. PloS ONE 7(9), pp. e45961, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0045961.
  35. B. Meijering, N. A. Taatgen, H. van Rijn & R. Verbrugge (2014): Modeling inference of mental states: As simple as possible, as complex as necessary. Interaction Studies 15(3), pp. 455–477, doi:10.1075/is.15.3.05mei.
  36. R. Nagel (1995): Unraveling in guessing games: An experimental study. The American Economic Review 85(5), pp. 1313–1326.
  37. R. Nagel & F. F. Tang (1998): Experimental results on the centipede game in normal form: An investigation on learning. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 42(2), pp. 356–384, doi:10.1006/jmps.1998.1225.
  38. E. Pacuit (2015): Dynamic models of rational deliberation in games. In: J. van Benthem, S. Ghosh & R. Verbrugge: Models of Strategic Reasoning: Logics, Games and Communities, LNCS-FoLLI 8972. Springer, New York, NY, pp. 3–33, doi:10.1007/978-3-662-48540-81.
  39. D. Pearce (1984): Rationalizable strategic behaviour and the problem of perfection. Econometrica 52, pp. 1029–1050, doi:10.2307/1911197.
  40. A. Perea (2007): Epistemic foundations for backward induction: An overview. In: J. van Benthem, D. Gabbay & B. Löwe: Interactive Logic, Texts in Logic and Games 1. Amsterdam University Press, pp. 159–193.
  41. A. Perea (2012): Epistemic Game Theory: Reasoning and Choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, doi:10.1017/CBO9780511844072.
  42. D. Premack & G. Woodruff (1978): Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1(04), pp. 515–526, doi:10.1017/S0140525X00076512.
  43. P. J. Reny (1992): Backward induction, normal form perfection and explicable equilibria. Econometrica 60, pp. 627–649, doi:10.2307/2951586.
  44. A. Rubinstein (2013): Response time and decision making: An experimental study. Judgment and Decision Making 8(5), pp. 540–551, doi:10.1.1.396.668.
  45. A. Rubinstein (2016): A typology of players: Between instinctive and contemplative. Quarterly Journal of Economics 131(2), pp. 859–890, doi:10.1093/qje/qjw008.
  46. Q. Shahriar (2014): An experimental test of the robustness and the power of forward induction. Managerial and Decision Economics 35, pp. 264–277, doi:10.1002/mde.2613.
  47. D. O. Stahl & P. W. Wilson (1995): On players' models of other players: Theory and experimental evidence. Games and Economic Behavior 10(1), pp. 218–254, doi:10.1006/game.1995.1031.
  48. H. de Weerd, R. Verbrugge & B. Verheij (2017): Negotiating with other minds: The role of recursive theory of mind in negotiation with incomplete information. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 31(2), pp. 250–287, doi:10.1007/s10458-015-9317-1.
  49. H. de Weerd, D. Diepgrond & R. Verbrugge (2017, to appear): Estimating the use of higher-order theory of mind using computational agents. The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics.
  50. H. de Weerd, R. Verbrugge & B. Verheij (2013): How much does it help to know what she knows you know? An agent-based simulation study. Artificial Intelligence 199, pp. 67–92, doi:10.1016/j.artint.2013.05.004.
  51. J. R. Wright & K. Leyton-Brown (2010): Beyond equilibrium: Predicting human behavior in normal-form games. In: Proceedings of the 24th Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 901–907.

Comments and questions to: eptcs@eptcs.org
For website issues: webmaster@eptcs.org