M. Allais (1953):
Le comportement de l'homme rationnel devant le risque: Critique des postulats et axiomes de l'école Américaine.
Econometrica 21,
pp. 503–546,
doi:10.2307/1907921.
Y. Azrieli, C. P. Chambers & P. J. Healy (2012):
Incentives in experiments: A theoretical analysis.
Working paper.
M. Bacharach & D. O. Stahl (2000):
Variable-frame level-n theory.
Games and Economic Behavior 32(2),
pp. 220–246,
doi:10.1006/game.2000.0796.
D. Balkenborg & R. Nagel (2016):
An Experiment on Forward vs. Backward Induction: How Fairness and Level k Reasoning Matter.
German Economic Review 17(3),
pp. 378–408,
doi:10.1111/geer.12099.
P. Battigalli (1996):
Strategic rationality orderings and the best rationalizability principle.
Games and Economic Behavior 13,
pp. 178–200,
doi:10.1006/game.1996.0033.
P. Battigalli (1997):
On rationalizability in extensive games.
Journal of Economic Theory 74,
pp. 40–61,
doi:10.1006/jeth.1996.2252.
G. Bergwerff, B. Meijering, J. Szymanik, R. Verbrugge & S. Wierda (2014):
Computational and algorithmic models of strategies in turn-based games.
In: Proceedings of the 36th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society,
pp. 1778–1783.
G. P. Cachon & C. Camerer (1996):
Loss-avoidance and forward induction in experimental coordination games.
The Quarterly Journal of Economics 111(1),
pp. 165–94,
doi:10.2307/2946661.
C. F. Camerer, T.-H. Ho & J.-K. Chong (2004):
A cognitive hierarchy model of games.
The Quarterly Journal of Economics 119(3),
pp. 861–898,
doi:10.1162/0033553041502225.
J. Chen & S. Micali (2011):
The robustness of extensive-form rationalizability.
Working paper.
J. Chen & S. Micali (2013):
The order independence of iterated dominance in extensive games.
Theoretical Economics 8,
pp. 125–163,
doi:10.3982/TE942.
N. Chlaß & A. Perea (2016):
How do people reason in dynamic games?.
Beiträge zur Jahrestagung des Vereins für Socialpolitik 2016: Demographischer Wandel - Session: Economic Theory and Personality, No. A04-V2.
M. A. Costa-Gomes & V. P. Crawford (2006):
Cognition and behavior in two-person guessing games: An experimental study.
The American Economic Review 96(5),
pp. 1737–1768,
doi:10.1257/aer.96.5.1737.
M. A. Costa-Gomes, V. P. Crawford & B. Broseta (2001):
Cognition and behavior in normal-form games: An experimental study.
Econometrica 69(5),
pp. 1193–1235,
doi:10.1111/1468-0262.00239.
V. P. Crawford, M. A. Costa-Gomes & N. Iriberri (2013):
Structural models of nonequilibrium strategic thinking: Theory, evidence, and applications.
Journal of Economic Literature 51(1),
pp. 5–62,
doi:10.1257/jel.51.1.5.
A. M. Evans & J. I. Krueger (2011):
Elements of trust: Risk and perspective-taking.
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 47(1),
pp. 171–177,
doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.08.007.
A. M. Evans & J. I. Krueger (2014):
Outcomes and expectations in dilemmas of trust.
Judgment and Decision making 9(2),
pp. 90.
L. Flobbe, R. Verbrugge, P. Hendriks & I. Krämer (2008):
Children's Application of Theory of Mind in Reasoning and Language.
Journal of Logic, Language and Information,
doi:10.1007/s10849-008-9064-7.
Special issue on formal models for real people, edited by M. Counihan.
S. Ghosh, A. Heifetz & R. Verbrugge (2015):
Do players reason by forward induction in dynamic perfect information games?.
In: R. Ramanujam: Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2015, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, June 4-6, 2015.,
EPTCS 215,
pp. 159–175,
doi:10.4204/EPTCS.215.12.
Available at https://doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.215.12.
S. Ghosh, B. Meijering & R. Verbrugge (2014):
Strategic Reasoning: Building Cognitive Models from Logical Formulas.
Journal of Logic, Language and Information 23(1),
pp. 1–29,
doi:10.1007/s10849-014-9196-x.
S. Ghosh & R. Verbrugge (2017):
Studying strategies and types of players: Experiments, logics and cognitive models.
Synthese,
pp. 1–43,
doi:10.1007/s11229-017-1338-7.
D. Gill & V. Prowse (2016):
Cognitive ability, character skills, and learning to play equilibrium: A level-k analysis.
Journal of Political Economy 124(6),
pp. 1619–1676,
doi:10.1086/688849.
J. K. Goeree & Ch. A. Holt (2004):
A model of noisy introspection.
Games and Economic Behavior 46(2),
pp. 365–382,
doi:10.1016/S0899-8256(03)00145-3.
T. Hedden & J. Zhang (2002):
What do you think I think you think?: Strategic reasoning in matrix games.
Cognition 85(1),
pp. 1–36,
doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00054-9.
A. Heifetz & A. Perea (2015):
On the outcome equivalence of backward induction and extensive form rationalizability.
International Journal of Game Theory 44(1),
pp. 37–59,
doi:10.1007/s00182-014-0418-x.
S. Huck & W. Müller (2005):
Burning money and (pseudo) first-mover advantages: An experimental study on forward induction.
Games and Economic Behavior 51(1),
pp. 109–127,
doi:10.1016/j.geb.2004.03.006.
T. Kawagoe & H. Takizawa (2012):
Level-k analysis of experimental centipede games.
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 82(2),
pp. 548–566,
doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2012.03.010.
A. L. McCutcheon (1987):
Latent Class Analysis.
Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences 07-064.
Sage Publications,
Newbury Park, CA,
doi:10.4135/9781412984713.
R. D. McKelvey & T. R. Palfrey (1992):
An experimental study of the centipede game.
Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society,
pp. 803–836,
doi:10.2307/2951567.
R. D. McKelvey & T. R. Palfrey (1995):
Quantal response equilibria for normal form games.
Games and Economic Behavior 10(1),
pp. 6–38,
doi:10.1006/game.1995.1023.
B. Meijering, L. van Maanen, H. van Rijn & R. Verbrugge (2010):
The facilitative effect of context on second-order social reasoning.
In: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society,
pp. 1423–1428.
B. Meijering, H. van Rijn, N. A. Taatgen & R. Verbrugge (2011):
I do know what you think I think: Second-order theory of mind in strategic games is not that difficult.
In: Proc. 33rd Annual Conf. Cognitive Science Society,
pp. 2486–2491.
B. Meijering, H. van Rijn, N.A. Taatgen & R. Verbrugge (2012):
What eye movements can tell about theory of mind in a strategic game.
PloS ONE 7(9),
pp. e45961,
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0045961.
B. Meijering, N. A. Taatgen, H. van Rijn & R. Verbrugge (2014):
Modeling inference of mental states: As simple as possible, as complex as necessary.
Interaction Studies 15(3),
pp. 455–477,
doi:10.1075/is.15.3.05mei.
R. Nagel (1995):
Unraveling in guessing games: An experimental study.
The American Economic Review 85(5),
pp. 1313–1326.
R. Nagel & F. F. Tang (1998):
Experimental results on the centipede game in normal form: An investigation on learning.
Journal of Mathematical Psychology 42(2),
pp. 356–384,
doi:10.1006/jmps.1998.1225.
E. Pacuit (2015):
Dynamic models of rational deliberation in games.
In: J. van Benthem, S. Ghosh & R. Verbrugge: Models of Strategic Reasoning: Logics, Games and Communities,
LNCS-FoLLI 8972.
Springer,
New York, NY,
pp. 3–33,
doi:10.1007/978-3-662-48540-81.
D. Pearce (1984):
Rationalizable strategic behaviour and the problem of perfection.
Econometrica 52,
pp. 1029–1050,
doi:10.2307/1911197.
A. Perea (2007):
Epistemic foundations for backward induction: An overview.
In: J. van Benthem, D. Gabbay & B. Löwe: Interactive Logic,
Texts in Logic and Games 1.
Amsterdam University Press,
pp. 159–193.
A. Perea (2012):
Epistemic Game Theory: Reasoning and Choice.
Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge,
doi:10.1017/CBO9780511844072.
D. Premack & G. Woodruff (1978):
Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind?.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1(04),
pp. 515–526,
doi:10.1017/S0140525X00076512.
P. J. Reny (1992):
Backward induction, normal form perfection and explicable equilibria.
Econometrica 60,
pp. 627–649,
doi:10.2307/2951586.
A. Rubinstein (2013):
Response time and decision making: An experimental study.
Judgment and Decision Making 8(5),
pp. 540–551,
doi:10.1.1.396.668.
A. Rubinstein (2016):
A typology of players: Between instinctive and contemplative.
Quarterly Journal of Economics 131(2),
pp. 859–890,
doi:10.1093/qje/qjw008.
Q. Shahriar (2014):
An experimental test of the robustness and the power of forward induction.
Managerial and Decision Economics 35,
pp. 264–277,
doi:10.1002/mde.2613.
D. O. Stahl & P. W. Wilson (1995):
On players' models of other players: Theory and experimental evidence.
Games and Economic Behavior 10(1),
pp. 218–254,
doi:10.1006/game.1995.1031.
H. de Weerd, R. Verbrugge & B. Verheij (2017):
Negotiating with other minds: The role of recursive theory of mind in negotiation with incomplete information.
Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 31(2),
pp. 250–287,
doi:10.1007/s10458-015-9317-1.
H. de Weerd, D. Diepgrond & R. Verbrugge (2017, to appear):
Estimating the use of higher-order theory of mind using computational agents.
The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics.
H. de Weerd, R. Verbrugge & B. Verheij (2013):
How much does it help to know what she knows you know? An agent-based simulation study.
Artificial Intelligence 199,
pp. 67–92,
doi:10.1016/j.artint.2013.05.004.
J. R. Wright & K. Leyton-Brown (2010):
Beyond equilibrium: Predicting human behavior in normal-form games.
In: Proceedings of the 24th Conference on Artificial Intelligence,
pp. 901–907.