References

  1. R. Alur, T. A. Henziger & O. Kupferman (1997): Alternating-Time Temporal Logic. In: Proceedings of the 38th IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 100–109, doi:10.1109/SFCS.1997.646098.
  2. R. Alur, T. A. Henziger & O. Kupferman (2002): Alternating-Time Temporal Logic. Journal of the ACM 49(5), pp. 672–713, doi:10.1145/585265.585270.
  3. A. David (2013): TATL: Implementation of ATL Tableau-Based Decision Procedure. LNCS 8123, pp. 97–103, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-40537-2_10.
  4. A. Degtyarev, M. Fisher & B. Konev (2006): Monodic temporal resolution. ACM Trans. Comput. Log 7(1), pp. 108–150, doi:10.1145/1119439.1119443.
  5. V. Goranko (2001): Coalition games and alternating temporal logics. In: TARK '01. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, USA, pp. 259–272. Available at http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1028128.1028157.
  6. V. Goranko & D. Shkatov (2009): Tableau-Based Decision Procedures for Logics of Strategic Ability in Multiagent Systems. ACM Transactions on Computational Logic 11(1), pp. 3:1–3:51, doi:10.1145/1614431.1614434.
  7. R. Goré, J. Thomson & F. Widmann (2011): An Experimental Comparison of Theorem Provers for CTL. In: C. Combi, M. Leucker & F.. Wolter: TIME 2011,Germany, September 12-14. IEEE, pp. 49–56, doi:10.1109/TIME.2011.16.
  8. H. Hansen (2004): Tableau Games for Coalition Logic and Alternating-Time Temporal Logic – theory and implementation. University of Amsterdam.
  9. A. Herzig (2007): Logics for Agency and Multi-Agent Systems. Slides. ESSLLI. Available at http://www.staff.science.uu.nl/~broer110/ESSLLI07/.
  10. U. Hustadt & R. A. Schmidt (2002): Scientific Benchmarking with Temporal Logic Decision Procedures. In: D. Fensel, F. Giunchiglia, D. McGuinness & M-A. Williams: KR'2002. M. Kaufmann, pp. 533–544.
  11. C. Nalon, L. Zhang, C. Dixon & U. Hustadt (2013): A resolution-based calculus for Coalition Logic (Extended Version). Technical Report ULCS-13-004. University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. Available at http://intranet.csc.liv.ac.uk/research/techreports/?id=ULCS-13-004.
  12. C. Nalon, L. Zhang, C. Dixon & U. Hustadt (2014): A resolution-based calculus for Coalition Logic. Journal of Logic and Computation, doi:10.1093/logcom/ext074. To appear.
  13. M. Pauly (2001): Logic for Social Software. University of Amsterdam. Dissertation Series 2001-10.
  14. M. Pauly (2002): A Modal Logic for Coalitional Power in Games. Journal of Logic and Computation 12(1), pp. 149–166, doi:10.1093/logcom/12.1.149.
  15. J.A. Robinson (1965): A Machine–Oriented Logic Based on the Resolution Principle. Journal of the ACM 12(1), pp. 23–41, doi:10.1145/321250.321253.
  16. D. Walther, C. Lutz, F. Wolter & M. Wooldridge (2006): ATL Satisfiability is Indeed ExpTime-complete. Journal of Logic and Computation 16(6), pp. 765–787, doi:10.1093/logcom/exl009.

Comments and questions to: eptcs@eptcs.org
For website issues: webmaster@eptcs.org