References

  1. C. Banphawatthanarak & B. H. Krogh (2000): Verification of stateflow diagrams using smv: sf2smv 2.0. Technical Report CMU-ECE-2000-020. Carnegie Mellon University.
  2. P. Boström et al. (2007): Stepwise Development of Simulink Models Using the Refinement Calculus Framework. In: ICTAC 2007, LNCS 4711, pp. 79–93, doi:10.1007/978-3-540-75292-9\voidb@x 0.06emwidth0.5em6.
  3. BS EN 61508-3:2002 (2002): Functional safety of electrical/electronic/programmable electronic safety related systems – Part 1: General requirements.
  4. P. Caspi et al. (2003): From Simulink to SCADE/lustre to TTA: a layered approach for distributed embedded applications. ACM SIGPLAN Notices 38(7), pp. 153–162, doi:10.1145/780753.780754.
  5. A. L. C. Cavalcanti et al. (2011): From control law diagrams to Ada via Circus. FAC, pp. 1–48, doi:10.1007/s00165-010-0170-3.
  6. A. L. C. Cavalcanti et al. (2003): A Refinement Strategy for Circus. FAC 15(2 - 3), pp. 146–181, doi:10.1007/s00165-003-0006-5.
  7. C. Chen (2010): Formal Analysis for Stateflow Diagrams. In: SSIRI-C '10, pp. 102–109, doi:10.1109/SSIRI-C.2010.29.
  8. E. W. Dijkstra (1975): Guarded commands, nondeterminacy and formal derivation of programs. Commun. ACM 18(8), pp. 453–457, doi:10.1145/360933.360975.
  9. DO-178b (1992): Software Considerations in Airborne Systems and Equipment Certification.
  10. G. Hamon (2005): A denotational semantics for Stateflow. In: EMSOFT. ACM, pp. 164–172, doi:10.1145/1086228.1086260.
  11. G. Hamon & J. Rushby (2004): An Operational Semantics for Stateflow. In: FASE, LCNS 2984. Springer-Verlag, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 229–243, doi:10.1007/s10009-007-0049-7.
  12. D. Harel (1987): Statecharts: A Visual Formalism for Complex Systems. SCP 8(3), pp. 231–274, doi:10.1016/0167-6423(87)90035-9.
  13. R. Lublinerman et al. (2009): Modular code generation from synchronous block diagrams: modularity vs. code size. In: POPL' 09. ACM, pp. 78–89, doi:10.1145/1480881.1480893.
  14. A. Miyazawa & A. L. C. Cavalcanti: Refinement of the AbsoluteValue chart. Available at www.cs.york.ac.uk/ alvarohm/refinement.
  15. A. Miyazawa & A. L. C. Cavalcanti (2011): A formal semantics of Stateflow charts. Technical Report YCS-2011-461. University of York.
  16. A. Miyazawa & A. L. C. Cavalcanti (2011): Refinement-oriented models of Stateflow charts. SCP. (to appear).
  17. C. C. Morgan (1994): Programming from Specifications. Prentice Hall International Series in Computer Science.
  18. E.-R. Olderog (1991): Nets, terms and formulas: three views of concurrent processes and their relationship. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, doi:10.1017/CBO9780511526589.
  19. M. V. M. Oliveira (2006): Formal Derivation of State-Rich Reactive Programs using Circus. Department of Computer Science - University of York, UK. YCST-2006-02.
  20. G. Reeve & S. Reeves (2006): Logic and refinement for charts. ACSC '06, Australia, pp. 13–23.
  21. A. W. Roscoe (1998): The Theory and Practice of Concurrency. Prentice-Hall Series in Computer Science. Prentice-Hall, New York. Oxford.
  22. N. Scaife et al. (2004): Defining and translating a "safe" subset of simulink/stateflow into lustre. In: EMSOFT. ACM, pp. 259–268, doi:10.1145/1017753.1017795.
  23. The MathWorks,Inc.: Real-Time Workshop. www.mathworks.co.uk/products.
  24. The MathWorks,Inc.: Simulink. www.mathworks.co.uk/products.
  25. The MathWorks,Inc.: Stateflow and Stateflow Coder 7 User's Guide. www.mathworks.co.uk/products.
  26. A. Tiwari (2002): Formal semantics and analysis methods for Simulink Stateflow models. Technical Report. SRI International. www.csl.sri.com/tiwari/stateflow.html.
  27. A. Toom et al. (2008): Gene-Auto: an Automatic Code Generator for a safe subset of Simulink/Stateflow and Scicos. In: ERTS'08.
  28. I. Toyn & A. Galloway (2005): Proving properties of Stateflow models using ISO Standard Z and CADiZ. In: ZB-2005, vol. 3455 of LNCS, pp. 104–123, doi:10.1007/11415787\voidb@x 0.06emwidth0.5em7.
  29. J. C. P. Woodcock & A. L. C. Cavalcanti (2002): The Semantics of Circus. In: ZB 2002: Formal Specification and Development in Z and B, LCNS 2272. Springer-Verlag, pp. 184–203, doi:10.1007/3-540-45648-1\voidb@x 0.06emwidth0.5em10.
  30. J. C. P. Woodcock & J. Davies (1996): Using Z: specification, refinement, and proof. Prentice-Hall, Inc..

Comments and questions to: eptcs@eptcs.org
For website issues: webmaster@eptcs.org