References

  1. Esma Balkır, Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh & Bob Coecke (2016): Distributional Sentence Entailment Using Density Matrices. In: Mohammad T. Hajiaghayi & Mohammad R. Mousavi: Topics in Theoretical Computer Science, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 9541. Springer, Cham, pp. 1–22. Available at https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28678-5_1.
  2. Dea Bankova, Bob Coecke, Martha Lewis & Dan Marsden (2019): Graded Hyponymy for Compositional Distributional Semantics. Journal of Language Modelling 6(2), pp. 225, doi:10.15398/jlm.v6i2.230. Available at http://jlm.ipipan.waw.pl/index.php/JLM/article/view/230.
  3. Marco Baroni & Roberto Zamparelli (2010): Nouns are Vectors, Adjectives are Matrices: Representing Adjective-Noun Constructions in Semantic Space. In: Proceedings of the 2010 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 1183–1193. Available at https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.5555/1870658.1870773.
  4. William Blacoe, Elham Kashefi & Mirella Lapata (2013): A Quantum-Theoretic Approach to Distributional Semantics. In: Proceedings of the 2013 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. Association for Computational Linguistics, Atlanta, Georgia, pp. 847–857. Available at https://aclanthology.org/N13-1105.
  5. Tai-Danae Bradley & Yiannis Vlassopoulos (2021): Language Modeling with Reduced Densities. Compositionality 3, pp. 4. Available at https://doi.org/10.32408/compositionality-3-4.
  6. Saskia Bruhn (2021): Density Matrix Methods in Quantum Natural Language Processing. Master’s thesis, Universität Osnabrück, 2022. doi: 10.48693/111.
  7. Bob Coecke (2021): The mathematics of text structure. Joachim Lambek: The Interplay of Mathematics, Logic, and Linguistics, pp. 181–217. Available at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1904.03478.
  8. Bob Coecke & Konstantinos Meichanetzidis (2020): Meaning Updating of Density Matrices. Journal of Applied Logics 2631(5), pp. 745. Available at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2001.00862.
  9. Bob Coecke & Éric Oliver Paquette (2011): Categories for the practising physicist. In: New Structures for Physics. Springer, pp. 173–286. Available at https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12821-9_3.
  10. Bob Coecke, Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh & Stephen J Clark (2010): Mathematical Foundations for a Compositional Distributional Model of Meaning. Linguistic Analysis 36(1), pp. 345–384. Available at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1003.4394.
  11. Alexis Conneau, Douwe Kiela, Holger Schwenk, Loïc Barrault & Antoine Bordes (2017): Supervised Learning of Universal Sentence Representations from Natural Language Inference Data. In: Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 670–680, doi:10.18653/v1/D17-1070.
  12. Adriana D. Correia, Michael Moortgat & Henk T. C. Stoof (2020): Density Matrices with Metric for Derivational Ambiguity, doi:10.48550/arXiv.1908.07347. Available at http://arxiv.org/abs/1908.07347.
  13. Gemma De las Cuevas, Andreas Klingler, Martha Lewis & Tim Netzer (2020): Cats Climb Entails Mammals Move: Preserving Hyponymy in Compositional Distributional Semantics. arXiv:2005.14134 [cs, math]. Available at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2005.14134.
  14. Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee & Kristina Toutanova (2019): BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding. In: Jill Burstein, Christy Doran & Thamar Solorio: Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers). Association for Computational Linguistics, Minneapolis, Minnesota, pp. 4171–4186, doi:10.18653/v1/N19-1423. Available at https://aclanthology.org/N19-1423.
  15. Sam Glucksberg & Boaz Keysar (1990): Understanding metaphorical comparisons: Beyond similarity.. Psychological review 97(1), pp. 3. Available at https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.97.1.3.
  16. Dimitri Kartsaklis (2015): Compositional Distributional Semantics with Compact Closed Categories and Frobenius Algebras. University of Oxford. Available at https://arxiv.org/abs/1505.00138.
  17. Dimitri Kartsaklis, Matthew Purver & Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh (2016): Verb Phrase Ellipsis using Frobenius Algebras in Categorical Compositional Distributional Semantics. In: DSALT Workshop, European Summer School on Logic, Language and Information, pp. 1–2. Available at https://www.eecs.qmul.ac.uk/~mpurver/papers/kartsaklis-et-al16dsalt.pdf.
  18. Germán Kruszewski, Denis Paperno, Raffaella Bernardi & Marco Baroni (2016): There Is No Logical Negation Here, But There Are Alternatives: Modeling Conversational Negation with Distributional Semantics. Computational Linguistics 42(4), pp. 637–660, doi:10.1162/COLI_a_00262. Available at https://aclanthology.org/J16-4003.
  19. Joachim Lambek (1997): Type Grammar Revisited. In: Alain Lecomte, François Lamarche & Guy Perrier: Logical Aspects of Computational Linguistics, Second International Conference, LACL '97, Nancy, France, September 22-24, 1997, Selected Papers, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1582. Springer, pp. 1–27. Available at https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48975-4_1.
  20. Michael Lesk (1986): Automatic sense disambiguation using machine readable dictionaries: how to tell a pine cone from an ice cream cone. In: Proceedings of the 5th annual international conference on Systems documentation, SIGDOC '86. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, pp. 24–26, doi:10.1145/318723.318728. Available at https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/318723.318728.
  21. Martha Lewis (2019): Compositional Hyponymy with Positive Operators. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing (RANLP 2019). INCOMA Ltd., Varna, Bulgaria, pp. 638–647, doi:10.26615/978-954-452-056-4_075. Available at https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/R19-1075.
  22. Martha Lewis (2020): Towards Logical Negation for Compositional Distributional Semantics. IfCoLog Journal of Applied Logics 7(5), pp. 771–794. Available at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2005.04929.
  23. Robin Lorenz, Anna Pearson, Konstantinos Meichanetzidis, Dimitri Kartsaklis & Bob Coecke (2023): QNLP in practice: Running compositional models of meaning on a quantum computer. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 76, pp. 1305–1342, doi:10.1613/jair.1.14329.
  24. Francois Meyer & Martha Lewis (2020): Modelling Lexical Ambiguity with Density Matrices. In: Proceedings of the 24th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning. Association for Computational Linguistics, Online, pp. 276–290, doi:10.18653/v1/2020.conll-1.21. Available at https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/2020.conll-1.21.
  25. Tomas Mikolov, Ilya Sutskever, Kai Chen, Greg S Corrado & Jeff Dean (2013): Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. Advances in neural information processing systems 26. Available at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1310.4546.
  26. George A. Miller (1995): WordNet: A Lexical Database for English. Communinications of the ACM 38(11), pp. 39–41. Available at http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/219717.219748.
  27. Jeff Mitchell & Mirella Lapata (2010): Composition in Distributional Models of Semantics. Cognitive Science 34(8), pp. 1388–1429, doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01106.x. Available at https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01106.x.
  28. Saif Mohammad, Ekaterina Shutova & Peter Turney (2016): Metaphor as a medium for emotion: An empirical study. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics, pp. 23–33, doi:10.18653/v1/S16-2003.
  29. Roberto Navigli (2009): Word sense disambiguation: A survey. ACM computing surveys (CSUR) 41(2), pp. 1–69. Available at https://doi.org/10.1145/1459352.1459355.
  30. Jeffrey Pennington, Richard Socher & Christopher D Manning (2014): Glove: Global vectors for word representation. In: Proceedings of the 2014 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing (EMNLP), pp. 1532–1543, doi:10.3115/v1/D14-1162.
  31. Robin Piedeleu, Dimitri Kartsaklis, Bob Coecke & Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh (2015): Open System Categorical Quantum Semantics in Natural Language Processing. In: Lawrence S. Moss & Pawel Soboci'nski: 6th Conference on Algebra and Coalgebra in Computer Science, CALCO 2015, June 24-26, 2015, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, LIPIcs 35. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik, pp. 270–289. Available at https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.CALCO.2015.270.
  32. Anne Preller & Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh (2011): Bell States and Negative Sentences in the Distributed Model of Meaning. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 270(2), pp. 141 – 153. Available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcs.2011.01.028. Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Quantum Physics and Logic (QPL 2009).
  33. Nils Reimers & Iryna Gurevych (2019): Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks. In: Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP), pp. 3982–3992, doi:10.18653/v1/D19-1410.
  34. Benjamin Rodatz, Razin Shaikh & Lia Yeh (2021): Conversational Negation Using Worldly Context in Compositional Distributional Semantics. In: Proceedings of the 2021 Workshop on Semantic Spaces at the Intersection of NLP, Physics, and Cognitive Science (SemSpace). Association for Computational Linguistics, Groningen, The Netherlands, pp. 53–65. Available at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2105.05748.
  35. Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh, Dimitri Kartsaklis & Esma Balkır (2018): Sentence Entailment in Compositional Distributional Semantics. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 82(4), pp. 189–218. Available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s10472-017-9570-x.
  36. Hinrich Schütze (1998): Automatic Word Sense Discrimination. Comput. Linguist. 24(1), pp. 97–123. Available at https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/972719.972724.
  37. Peter Selinger (2007): Dagger Compact Closed Categories and Completely Positive Maps: (Extended Abstract). Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 170, pp. 139 – 163. Available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcs.2006.12.018. Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Quantum Programming Languages (QPL 2005).
  38. Razin A. Shaikh, Lia Yeh, Benjamin Rodatz & Bob Coecke (2022): Composing Conversational Negation. Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science 372, pp. 352–367. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.372.25.
  39. Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser & Illia Polosukhin (2017): Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information processing systems 30. Available at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1706.03762.
  40. John van de Wetering (2017): Ordering information on distributions. ArXiv:1701.06924.
Comments and questions to: eptcs@eptcs.org
For website issues: webmaster@eptcs.org