References

  1. Scott Aaronson & Daniel Gottesman (2004): Improved simulation of stabilizer circuits. Physical Review A 70, pp. 052328, doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.70.052328.
  2. Koenraad M R Audenaert & Martin B Plenio (2005): Entanglement on mixed stabilizer states: normal forms and reduction procedures. New Journal of Physics 7(1), pp. 170, doi:10.1088/1367-2630/7/1/170.
  3. Charles H. Bennett, Gilles Brassard, Claude Crépeau, Richard Jozsa, Asher Peres & William K. Wootters (1993): Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels. Physical Review Letters 70(13), pp. 1895–1899, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.1895.
  4. Charles H. Bennett & Stephen J. Wiesner (1992): Communication via one- and two-particle operators on Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen states. Physical Review Letters 69, pp. 2881–2884, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.2881.
  5. Simon J. Gay, Rajagopal Nagarajan & Nikolaos Papanikolaou (2008): QMC: A Model Checker for Quantum Systems. In: Aarti Gupta & Sharad Malik: Computer Aided Verification, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 5123. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 543–547, doi:10.1007/978-3-540-70545-1_51.
  6. Simon J. Gay, Rajagopal Nagarajan & Nikolaos Papanikolaou (2009): Specification and Verification of Quantum Protocols. In: Simon Gay & Ian Mackie: Semantic Techniques in Quantum Computation. Cambridge University Press, pp. 414–472, doi:10.1017/CBO9781139193313.012. Cambridge Books Online.
  7. Daniel Gottesman (1996): Class of quantum error-correcting codes saturating the quantum Hamming bound. Physical Review A 54, pp. 1862–1868, doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.54.1862.
  8. Philippe Jorrand & Simon Perdrix (2009): Abstract Interpretation Techniques for Quantum Computation. In: Simon Gay & Ian Mackie: Semantic Techniques in Quantum Computation. Cambridge University Press, pp. 206–234, doi:10.1017/CBO9781139193313.007.
  9. Michael A. Nielsen & Isaac L. Chuang (2000): Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press.
  10. Simon Perdrix (2007): Quantum Patterns and Types for Entanglement and Separability. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 170(0), pp. 125–138, doi:10.1016/j.entcs.2006.12.015.
  11. Simon Perdrix (2008): A Hierarchy of Quantum Semantics. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 192(3), pp. 71–83, doi:10.1016/j.entcs.2008.10.028.
  12. Simon Perdrix (2008): Quantum Entanglement Analysis Based on Abstract Interpretation. In: María Alpuente & Germán Vidal: Static Analysis, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 5079. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 270–282, doi:10.1007/978-3-540-69166-2_18.
  13. Frédéric Prost & Chaouki Zerrari (2009): Reasoning about Entanglement and Separability in Quantum Higher-Order Functions. In: CristianS. Calude, JoséFélix Costa, Nachum Dershowitz, Elisabete Freire & Grzegorz Rozenberg: Unconventional Computation, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 5715. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 219–235, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-03745-0_25.
  14. Robert Raussendorf & Hans J. Briegel (2001): A One-Way Quantum Computer. Physical Review Letters 86, pp. 5188–5191, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.5188.
  15. Peter Selinger (2004): Towards a quantum programming language. Mathematical Structures in Computer Science 14, pp. 527–586, doi:10.1017/S0960129504004256.

Comments and questions to: eptcs@eptcs.org
For website issues: webmaster@eptcs.org