References

  1. Samson Abramsky (2013): Relational hidden variables and non-locality. Studia Logica 101(2), pp. 411–452, doi:10.1007/s11225-013-9477-4.
  2. Samson Abramsky & Adam Brandenburger (2011): The sheaf-theoretic structure of non-locality and contextuality. New Journal of Physics 13(11), pp. 113036, doi:10.1088/1367-2630/13/11/113036.
  3. Samson Abramsky & Adam Brandenburger (2014): An Operational Interpretation of Negative Probabilities and No-Signalling Models. arXiv:1401.2561. ArXiv preprint.
  4. Samson Abramsky, Shane Mansfield & Rui Soares Barbosa (2012): The cohomology of non-locality and contextuality. In: Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science 95, pp. 1–14, doi:10.4204/EPTCS.95.1.
  5. Guido Bacciagaluppi, Antony Valentini & Martin Jähnert (2010): Quantum Theory at the Crossroads: Reconsidering the 1927 Solvay Conference. Physics Today 63(10), pp. 53.
  6. J. Barrett (2007): Information processing in generalized probabilistic theories. Physical Review A 75(3), pp. 032304, doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.75.032304.
  7. John S. Bell (1964): On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox. Physics 1(3), pp. 195–200.
  8. John S. Bell (1987): Speakable and unspeakable in quantum mechanics: Collected papers on quantum philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
  9. David Bohm (1952): A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of ``hidden'' variables. I. Physical Review 85(2), pp. 166, doi:10.1103/PhysRev.85.166.
  10. David Bohm (1952): A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of ``hidden'' variables. II. Physical Review 85(2), pp. 180, doi:10.1103/PhysRev.85.166.
  11. A. Brandenburger & N. Yanofsky (2008): A classification of hidden-variable properties. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 41, pp. 425302, doi:10.1088/1751-8113/41/42/425302.
  12. John F. Clauser, Michael A. Horne, Abner Shimony & Richard A. Holt (1969): Proposed experiment to test local hidden-variable theories. Physical Review Letters 23(15), pp. 880–884, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.23.880.
  13. Roger Colbeck & Renato Renner (2012): Is a System's Wave Function in One-to-One Correspondence with Its Elements of Reality?. Physical Review Letters 108(15), pp. 150402, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.150402.
  14. Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky & Nathan Rosen (1935): Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?. Physical Review 47(10), pp. 777, doi:10.1103/PhysRev.47.777.
  15. Arthur Fine (1982): Hidden variables, joint probability, and the Bell inequalities. Physical Review Letters 48(5), pp. 291–295, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.48.291.
  16. Gian-Carlo Ghirardi, Alberto Rimini & Tullio Weber (1980): A general argument against superluminal transmission through the quantum mechanical measurement process. Lettere Al Nuovo Cimento (1971–1985) 27(10), pp. 293–298, doi:10.1007/BF02817189.
  17. Michael J.W. Hall (2011): Generalisations of the recent Pusey-Barrett-Rudolph theorem for statistical models of quantum phenomena. arXiv:1111.6304. ArXiv preprint.
  18. Lucien Hardy (1992): Quantum mechanics, local realistic theories, and Lorentz-invariant realistic theories. Physical Review Letters 68(20), pp. 2981–2984, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.2981.
  19. Lucien Hardy (1993): Nonlocality for two particles without inequalities for almost all entangled states. Physical Review Letters 71(11), pp. 1665–1668, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.1665.
  20. Lucien Hardy (2013): Are quantum states real?. International Journal of Modern Physics B 27(01n03).
  21. Nicholas Harrigan & Robert W Spekkens (2010): Einstein, incompleteness, and the epistemic view of quantum states. Foundations of Physics 40(2), pp. 125–157, doi:10.1007/s10701-009-9347-0.
  22. Chris Heunen (2013). Private communication.
  23. CJ Isham & Jeremy Butterfield (1998): Topos perspective on the Kochen-Specker theorem: I. Quantum states as generalized valuations. International Journal of Theoretical Physics 37(11), pp. 2669–2733, doi:10.1023/A:1026680806775.
  24. Simon Kochen & Ernst P. Specker (1975): Logical structures arising in quantum theory. In: The Logico-Algebraic Approach to Quantum Mechanics. Springer, pp. 263–276, doi:10.1007/978-3-0348-9259-9/19.
  25. Peter G Lewis, David Jennings, Jonathan Barrett & Terry Rudolph (2012): Distinct quantum states can be compatible with a single state of reality. Physical Review Letters 109(15), pp. 150404, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.150404.
  26. Shane Mansfield (2013): The mathematical structure of non-locality & contextuality. D.Phil. thesis, Oxford University. Available at http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:394bb375-db3f-4a12-bdd8-cd1ab5809573.
  27. Shane Mansfield & Tobias Fritz (2012): Hardy's non-locality paradox and possibilistic conditions for non-locality. Foundations of Physics 42, pp. 709–719, doi:10.1007/s10701-012-9640-1.
  28. Shane Mansfield & Rui Soares Barbosa (2013): Extendability in the Sheaf-theoretic Approach: Construction of Bell Models from Kochen-Specker Models. In: Proceedings of Quantum Physics & Logic X.
  29. Sandu Popescu & Daniel Rohrlich (1994): Quantum nonlocality as an axiom. Foundations of Physics 24(3), pp. 379–385, doi:10.1007/BF02058098.
  30. Matthew F Pusey, Jonathan Barrett & Terry Rudolph (2012): On the reality of the quantum state. Nature Physics 8(6), pp. 476–479, doi:10.1038/nphys2309.
  31. Erwin Schrödinger (1936): Discussion of probability relations between separated systems. In: Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 32. Cambridge University Press, pp. 446–452, doi:10.1017/S0305004100013554.
Comments and questions to: eptcs@eptcs.org
For website issues: webmaster@eptcs.org