References

  1. Michaël Armand, Germain Faure, Benjamin Grégoire, Chantal Keller, Laurent Théry & Benjamin Werner (2011): A Modular Integration of SAT/SMT Solvers to Coq through Proof Witnesses. In: Jean-Pierre Jouannaud & Zhong Shao: Certified Programs and Proofs - First International Conference, CPP 2011, Kenting, Taiwan, December 7-9, 2011. Proceedings, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 7086. Springer, pp. 135–150, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-25379-9_12.
  2. Bruno Barras, Carst Tankink & Enrico Tassi (2015): Asynchronous Processing of Coq Documents: From the Kernel up to the User Interface. In: Christian Urban & Xingyuan Zhang: Interactive Theorem Proving - 6th International Conference, ITP 2015, Nanjing, China, August 24-27, 2015, Proceedings, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 9236. Springer, pp. 51–66, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-22102-1_4.
  3. Yves Bertot & Pierre Castéran (2004): Interactive Theorem Proving and Program Development, \voidb@x Coq'Art : The Calculus of Inductive Constructions. Texts in Theoretical Computer Science, An EATCS Series. Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg, doi:10.1007/978-3-662-07964-5. 469 pages.
  4. David Braun (2019): Approche combinatoire pour l'automatisation en Coq des preuves formelles en géométrie d'incidence projective. Université de Strasbourg. Available at https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-02512327.
  5. David Braun, Nicolas Magaud & Pascal Schreck (2019): Two Cryptomorphic Formalizations of Projective Incidence Geometry. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 85(2–4), pp. 193–212, doi:10.1007/s10472-018-9604-z. Available at https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01887000.
  6. David Braun, Nicolas Magaud & Pascal Schreck (2021): Two New Ways to Formally Prove Dandelin-Gallucci's Theorem. In: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM on International Symposium on Symbolic and Algebraic Computation, ISSAC 2021, Saint Petersbourg (Virtual), Russia, July 18-23, 2021. ACM, pp. –, doi:10.1145/3452143.3465550.
  7. Coq development team (2021): The Coq Proof Assistant Reference Manual, Version 8.13.2. INRIA. Available at http://coq.inria.fr.
  8. David Delahaye (2000): A Tactic Language for the System Coq. In: Michel Parigot & Andrei Voronkov: Logic for Programming and Automated Reasoning, 7th International Conference, LPAR 2000, Reunion Island, France, November 11-12, 2000, Proceedings, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1955. Springer, pp. 85–95, doi:10.1007/3-540-44404-1_7.
  9. Laura Kovács & Andrei Voronkov (2013): First-Order Theorem Proving and Vampire. In: Natasha Sharygina & Helmut Veith: Computer Aided Verification - 25th International Conference, CAV 2013, Saint Petersburg, Russia, July 13-19, 2013. Proceedings, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 8044. Springer, pp. 1–35, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-39799-8_1.
  10. Nicolas Magaud, Julien Narboux & Pascal Schreck (2012): A Case Study in Formalizing Projective Geometry in Coq: Desargues Theorem. Computational Geometry: Theory and Applications 45(8), pp. 406–424, doi:10.1016/j.comgeo.2010.06.004. Available at http://hal.inria.fr/inria-00432810/en.
  11. Dominique Michelucci & Pascal Schreck (2006): Incidence Constraints: a Combinatorial Approach. Int. Journal of Computational Geometry and Applications 16(5-6), pp. 443–460, doi:10.1142/S0218195906002130.
  12. Leonardo Mendonça de Moura & Nikolaj Bjørner (2008): Z3: An Efficient SMT Solver. In: Proceedings of TACAS 2008, LNCS 4963. Springer, pp. 337–340, doi:10.1007/978-3-540-78800-3_24.

Comments and questions to: eptcs@eptcs.org
For website issues: webmaster@eptcs.org