References

1. Saloua Chatti & Fabien Schang (2013): The Cube, the Square and the Problem of Existential Import. History and Philosophy of Logic 34(2), pp. 101–132, doi:10.1080/01445340.2013.764962.
2. George Englebretsen (1969): Knowledge, Negation, and Incompatility. The Journal of Philosophy 66(18), pp. 580–585, doi:10.2307/2023970.
3. George Englebretsen (1980): On Propositional Form. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 21(1), pp. 101–110, doi:10.1305/ndjfl/1093882942.
4. George Englebretsen (1984): Opposition. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 25(1), pp. 79–84, doi:10.1305/ndjfl/1093882942.
5. George Englebretsen (1986): Singular/General. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 27(1), pp. 104–107, doi:10.1305/ndjfl/1093636528.
6. George Englebretsen (1988): A note on Leibniz's wild quantity thesis. Studia Leibnitiana 20(1), pp. 87–89. Available at https://www.jstor.org/stable/40694095.
7. George Englebretsen (2016): Fred Sommers' Contributions to Formal Logic. History and Philosophy of Logic 37(3), pp. 269–291, doi:10.1080/01445340.2016.1186884.
8. George Englebretsen (2016): La quadrature du carré. In: Amirouche Moktefi, Alessio Moretti & Fabien Schang: Let's be Logical. College Publications, London, pp. 49–64.
9. Lloyd Humberstone (2013): Logical relations. Philosophical Perspectives 27(1), pp. 175–230, doi:10.1111/phpe.12021.
10. Lloyd Humberstone (2020): Explicating Logical Independence. Journal of Philosophical Logic 49, pp. 135–218, doi:10.1007/s10992-019-09516-w.
11. John Neville Keynes (1906): Studies and Exercises in Formal Logic, 4 edition. MacMillan and Co. Limited. Available at https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/59590.
12. Stephen Read (2015): Aristotle andŁ ukasiewicz on Existential Import. Journal of the American Philosophical Association 1(3), pp. 535–544, doi:10.1017/apa.2015.8.
13. David H. Sanford (1968): Contraries and subcontraries. Noûs 2, pp. 95–96, doi:10.2307/2214419.

Comments and questions to: eptcs@eptcs.org

For website issues: webmaster@eptcs.org