References

  1. M. Avanzini & G. Moser (2008): Complexity Analysis by Rewriting. In: Proc. FLOPS, pp. 130–146, doi:10.1007/978-3-540-78969-7_11.
  2. P. Baillot & U. Dal Lago (2016): Higher-order interpretations and program complexity. IC, pp. 56–81, doi:10.1016/j.ic.2015.12.008.
  3. A. Ben Cherifa & P. Lescanne (1987): Termination of rewriting systems by polynomial interpretations and its implementation. Science of Computer Programming 9(2), pp. 137–159, doi:10.1016/0167-6423(87)90030-X.
  4. G. Bonfante, A. Cichon, J.-Y. Marion & H. Touzet (2001): Algorithms with polynomial interpretation termination proof. Journal of Functional Programming 11(1), pp. 33–53, doi:10.1017/S0956796800003877.
  5. G. Bonfante, J. Marion & J. Moyen (2001): On Lexicographic Termination Ordering with Space Bound Certifications. In: Proc. PSI, pp. 482–493, doi:10.1007/3-540-45575-2_46.
  6. A. Cichon & P. Lescanne (1992): Polynomial interpretations and the complexity of algorithms. In: CADE, pp. 139–147, doi:10.1007/3-540-55602-8_161.
  7. M. Codish, I. Gonopolskiy, A. M. Ben-Amram, C. Fuhs & J. Giesl (2011): SAT-based termination analysis using monotonicity constraints over the integers. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming 11(4-5), pp. 503–520, doi:10.1017/S1471068411000147.
  8. E. Contejan, C. Marché, A. P. Tomás & X. Urbain (2005): Mechanically Proving Termination Using Polynomial Interpretations. JAR 34(34), doi:10.1007/s10817-005-9022-x.
  9. Evelyne Contejean, Claude Marché, Ana Paula Tomás & Xavier Urbain (2005): Mechanically Proving Termination Using Polynomial Interpretations. JAR 34(4), pp. 325–363, doi:10.1007/s10817-005-9022-x.
  10. J. Giesl, C. Aschermann, M. Brockschmidt, F. Emmes, F. Frohn, C. Fuhs, J. Hensel, C. Otto, M. Plucker, P. Schneider-Kamp, T. Stroder, S. Swiderski & R. Thiemann (2017): Analyzing Program Termination and Complexity Automatically with AProVE. JAR 58, pp. 3–31, doi:10.1007/s10817-016-9388-y.
  11. N. Hirokawa & G. Moser (2008): Automated Complexity Analysis Based on the Dependency Pair Method. In: Proc. IJCAR, pp. 364–379, doi:10.1007/978-3-540-71070-7_32.
  12. D. Hofbauer (1992): Termination proofs by multiset path orderings imply primitive recursive derivation lengths. Proc. TCS, doi:10.1007/3-540-53162-9_50.
  13. D. Hofbauer (2001): Termination Proofs by Context-Dependent Interpretations. In: Proc. RTA, pp. 108–121, doi:10.1007/3-540-45127-7_10.
  14. D. Hofbauer & C. Lautemann (1989): Termination proofs and the length of derivations. In: Proc. RTA, pp. 167–177, doi:10.1007/3-540-51081-8_107.
  15. G. Huet & D.C Oppen (1980): Equations and rewrite rules: a survey. Formal Language Theory: Perspectives and Open Problems. Loria. Available at http://rewriting.loria.fr/documents/CS-TR-80-785.pdf.
  16. C. Kop & D. Vale (2021): Tuple Interpretations for Higher-Order Complexity. In: FSCD, pp. 31:1–31:22, doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2021.31.
  17. C. Lautemann (1988): A note on polynomial interpretation. Bulletin EATCS volume 36, pp. 129–131.
  18. F. Mitterwallner & A. Middeldorp (2022): Polynomial Termination Over N Is Undecidable. In: Proc. FSCD, pp. 27:1–27:17, doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2022.27.
  19. G. Moser (2017): Uniform Resource Analysis by Rewriting: Strengths and Weaknesses (Invited Talk). In: Proc. FSCD, pp. 2:1–2:10, doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2017.2.
  20. G. Moser, A. Schnabl & J. Waldmann (2008): Complexity Analysis of Term Rewriting Based on Matrix and Context Dependent Interpretations. In: Proc. IARCS, pp. 304–315, doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2008.1762.
  21. L. Noschinski, F. Emmes & J. Giesl (2011): A Dependency Pair Framework for Innermost Complexity Analysis of Term Rewrite Systems. In: CADE-23, pp. 422–438, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-22438-6_32.
  22. J. Steinbach (1992): Proving polynomials positive. In: In Proc. FSTTCS 92, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 191–202, doi:10.1007/3-540-56287-7_105.
  23. Yoshihito T. (1987): Counterexamples to termination for the direct sum of term rewriting systems. Information Processing Letters 25(3), pp. 141–143, doi:10.1016/0020-0190(87)90122-0.
  24. A. Weiermann (1995): Termination proofs for term rewriting systems by lexicographic path orderings imply multiply recursive derivation lengths. TCS, doi:10.1016/0304-3975(94)00135-6.
  25. A. Yamada (2022): Tuple Interpretations for Termination of Term Rewriting. J Autom Reasoning, doi:10.1007s10817-022-09640-4.

Comments and questions to: eptcs@eptcs.org
For website issues: webmaster@eptcs.org