References

  1. Rajeev Alur & David L. Dill (1994): A Theory of Timed Automata. TCS 126, pp. 183–235, doi:10.1016/0304-3975(94)90010-8.
  2. Rajeev Alur & Thomas A. Henzinger (1997): Modularity for Timed and Hybrid Systems. In: CONCUR, LNCS 1243. Springer, pp. 74–88, doi:10.1007/3-540-63141-0_6.
  3. Joaquín Arias, Manuel Carro, Zhuo Chen & Gopal Gupta (2022): Modeling and Reasoning in Event Calculus using Goal-Directed Constraint Answer Set Programming. TPLP 22(1), pp. 51–80, doi:10.1017/S1471068421000156.
  4. Joaquín Arias, Manuel Carro, Elmer Salazar, Kyle Marple & Gopal Gupta (2018): Constraint Answer Set Programming without Grounding. TPLP 18(3-4), pp. 337–354, doi:10.1017/S1471068418000285.
  5. Michael Gelfond & Vladimir Lifschitz: The Stable Model Semantics for Logic Programming. In: ICLP, pp. 1070–1080, doi:10.2307/2275201.
  6. Rodolfo Gómez & Howard Bowman (2007): Efficient Detection of Zeno Runs in Timed Automata. In: FORMATS, LNCS 4763. Springer, pp. 195–210, doi:10.1007/978-3-540-75454-1_15.
  7. Thomas A. Henzinger (1996): The Theory of Hybrid Automata. In: LICS. IEEE CS, pp. 278–292, doi:10.1109/LICS.1996.561342.
  8. Frédéric Herbreteau & B Srivathsan (2013): Coarse abstractions make Zeno behaviours difficult to detect. Logical Methods in Computer Science Volume 9, Issue 1:6, doi:10.2168/LMCS-9(1:6)2013.
  9. Karl Henrik Johansson, Magnus Egerstedt, John Lygeros & Shankar Sastry (1999): On the regularization of Zeno hybrid automata. Systems & control letters 38(3), pp. 141–150, doi:10.1016/S0167-6911(99)00059-6.
  10. Andrew G. Lamperski & Aaron D. Ames (2013): Lyapunov Theory for Zeno Stability. IEEE TAC 58, pp. 100–112, doi:10.1109/TAC.2012.2208292.
  11. Erik T. Mueller (2008): Chapter 17 Event Calculus. In: Handbook of Knowledge Representation, Foundations of Artificial Intelligence 3. Elsevier, pp. 671–708, doi:10.1016/S1574-6526(07)03017-9.
  12. Erik T. Mueller (2014): Commonsense Reasoning: An Event Calculus Based Approach. Morgan Kaufmann, doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-801416-5.00002-4.
  13. Anitha Murugesan, Isaac Hong Wong, Joaquín Arias & et. al. (2024): Automating Semantic Analysis of System Assurance Cases Using Goal-Directed ASP. TPLP 24(4), pp. 805–824, doi:10.1017/S1471068424000425.
  14. Jonas Rinast & Sibylle Schupp (2012): Static Detection of Zeno Runs in UPPAAL Networks Based on Synchronization Matrices and Two Data-Variable Heuristics. In: FORMATS. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 220–235, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-33365-1_16.
  15. Murray Shanahan (1996): Robotics and the Common Sense Informatic Situation. In: ECAI. Wiley, pp. 684–688.
  16. Murray Shanahan (1997): Solving the frame problem: a mathematical investigation of the common sense law of inertia. MIT Press.
  17. Sarat Chandra Varanasi, Joaquín Arias, Elmer Salazar & et. al. (2022): Modeling and Verification of Real-Time Systems with the Event Calculus and s(CASP). In: PADL. Springer Iternational, doi:10.1007/978-3-030-94479-7_12.
  18. Ondrej Vasicek, Joaquin Arias, Jan Fiedor & et. al. (2024): Early Validation of High-Level System Requirements with Event Calculus and Answer Set Programming. TPLP 24(4), pp. 844–862, doi:10.1017/S1471068424000280.
  19. Don Ward (2012): AVSI’s System Architecture Virtual Integration Program: Moving SAVI to the Launch Pad. In: 15th Annual NDIA Systems Engineering Conference. Available at https://ndia.dtic.mil/wp-content/uploads/2012/system/ttrack914871.pdf.
  20. Jun Zhang, Karl Henrik Johansson & et. al. (2001): Zeno hybrid systems. IJRNC 11(5), pp. 435–451, doi:10.1002/rnc.592.

Comments and questions to: eptcs@eptcs.org
For website issues: webmaster@eptcs.org