References

  1. Tathagata Chakraborti, Sarath Sreedharan, Yu Zhang & Subbarao Kambhampati (2017): Plan Explanations as Model Reconciliation: Moving Beyond Explanation as Soliloquy. In: Carles Sierra: IJCAI. ijcai.org, pp. 156–163, doi:10.24963/ijcai.2017/23.
  2. Thomas Eiter, Nicola Leone, Cristinel Mateis, Gerald Pfeifer & Francesco Scarcello (1998): The KR System dlv: Progress Report, Comparisons and Benchmarks. In: Anthony G. Cohn, Lenhart K. Schubert & Stuart C. Shapiro: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR'98), Trento, Italy, June 2-5, 1998. Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 406–417.
  3. Martin Gebser, Roland Kaminski, Benjamin Kaufmann & Torsten Schaub (2014): Clingo = ASP + Control: Preliminary Report. CoRR abs/1405.3694, doi:10.48550/ARXIV.1405.3694. Available at https://arxiv.org/abs/1405.3694.
  4. M. Gelfond & V. Lifschitz (1991): Classical negation in logic programs and disjunctive databases. New Generation Computing, pp. 365–387, doi:10.1007/BF03037169.
  5. Malik Ghallab, Adele Howe, Craig Knoblock, Drew McDermott, Ashwin Ram, Manuela Veloso, Daniel Weld & David Wilkins (1998): PDDL – the planning domain definition language. Technical Report TR-98-003. Yale CCVC.
  6. Sachin Grover, David E. Smith & Subbarao Kambhampati (2020): Model Elicitation through Direct Questioning. CoRR abs/2011.12262. ArXiv:2011.12262.
  7. V. Lifschitz (2002): Answer set programming and plan generation. Artificial Intelligence 138(1–2), pp. 39–54, doi:10.1016/S0004-3702(02)00186-8.
  8. V. Marek & M. Truszczyński (1999): Stable models and an alternative logic programming paradigm. In: The Logic Programming Paradigm: a 25-year Perspective, pp. 375–398, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-60085-2_17.
  9. Van Nguyen, Stylianos Loukas Vasileiou, Tran Cao Son & William Yeoh (2020): Explainable Planning Using Answer Set Programming. In: KRR, pp. 662–666.
  10. I. Niemelä (1999): Logic programming with stable model semantics as a constraint programming paradigm. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 25(3,4), pp. 241–273, doi:10.1023/A:1018930122475.
  11. Tran Cao Son, Van Nguyen, Stylianos Loukas Vasileiou & William Yeoh (2021): Model Reconciliation in Logic Programs. In: Wolfgang Faber, Gerhard Friedrich, Martin Gebser & Michael Morak: JELIA, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 12678. Springer, pp. 393–406, doi:10.1007/978-3-030-75775-5_26.
  12. Sarath Sreedharan, Tathagata Chakraborti & Subbarao Kambhampati (2021): Foundations of explanations as model reconciliation. Artif. Intell. 301, pp. 103558, doi:10.1016/j.artint.2021.103558.
  13. Sarath Sreedharan, Alberto Olmo Hernandez, Aditya Prasad Mishra & Subbarao Kambhampati (2019): Model-Free Model Reconciliation. In: Sarit Kraus: IJCAI. ijcai.org, pp. 587–594, doi:10.24963/ijcai.2019/83.
  14. Stylianos Loukas Vasileiou, Alessandro Previti & William Yeoh (2021): On Exploiting Hitting Sets for Model Reconciliation. In: Thirty-Fifth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2021, Thirty-Third Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence, IAAI 2021, The Eleventh Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence, EAAI 2021, Virtual Event, February 2-9, 2021. AAAI Press, pp. 6514–6521. Available at https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/AAAI/article/view/16807.

Comments and questions to: eptcs@eptcs.org
For website issues: webmaster@eptcs.org