References

  1. Christoph Benzmüller, Xavier Parent & Leendert van der Torre (2020): Designing normative theories for ethical and legal reasoning: LogiKEy framework, methodology, and tool support. Artificial Intelligence, pp. 103348, doi:10.1016/j.artint.2020.103348.
  2. Richard Berk (2019): Machine learning risk assessments in criminal justice settings. Springer, doi:10.1007/978-3-030-02272-3.
  3. Marc A. Borrelli (1990): Prolog and the Law: Using Expert Systems to Perform Legal Analysis in the United Kingdom. Softw. Law J. 3(4), pp. 687–715, doi:10.5555/91456.91463.
  4. Nuttawit Butsara, Panchan Athonthitichot & Pichai Jodpimai (2019): Predicting Recidivism to Drug Distribution using Machine Learning Techniques. In: 2019 17th International Conference on ICT and Knowledge Engineering (ICT&KE). IEEE, pp. 1–5, doi:10.1109/ICTKE47035.2019.8966834.
  5. Roberta Calegari, Giuseppe Contissa, Francesca Lagioia, Andrea Omicini & Giovanni Sartor (2019): Defeasible Systems in Legal Reasoning: A Comparative Assessment. In: Legal Knowledge and Information Systems - JURIX 2019, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications 322. IOS Press, pp. 169–174, doi:10.3233/FAIA190320.
  6. Stefania Costantini, Giovanni De Gasperis & Raffaele Olivieri (2019): Digital forensics and investigations meet artificial intelligence. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 86(1-3), pp. 193–229, doi:10.1007/s10472-019-09632-y.
  7. Mirna El Ghosh, Hala Naja, Habib Abdulrab & Mohamad Khalil (2017): Towards a legal rule-based system grounded on the integration of criminal domain ontology and rules. Procedia CS 112, pp. 632–642, doi:10.1016/j.procs.2017.08.109.
  8. Guido Governatori, Antonino Rotolo & Régis Riveret (2018): A Deontic Argumentation Framework Based on Deontic Defeasible Logic. In: International Conference on Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems. Springer, pp. 484–492, doi:10.1007/978-3-030-03098-8_33.
  9. Allen Hustler (1982): Programming law in logic. Research report CS-82-13, Department of Computer Science, University of Waterloo.
  10. Han-Wei Liu, Ching-Fu Lin & Yu-Jie Chen (2019): Beyond State v Loomis: artificial intelligence, government algorithmization and accountability. International Journal of Law and Information Technology 27(2), pp. 122–141, doi:10.1093/ijlit/eaz001.
  11. Masha Medvedeva, Michel Vols & Martijn Wieling (2020): Using machine learning to predict decisions of the European Court of Human Rights. Artif. Intell. Law 28(2), pp. 237–266, doi:10.1007/s10506-019-09255-y.
  12. Jeffrey Alan Meldman (1975): A preliminary study in computer-aided legal analysis.. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  13. William Lloyd Prosser (1941): Handbook of the Law of Torts. Louisiana Law Review 4.
  14. Cynthia Rudin (2019): Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead. Nature Machine Intelligence 1(5), pp. 206–215, doi:10.1038/s42256-019-0048-x.
  15. Marek J. Sergot, Fariba Sadri, Robert A. Kowalski, F. Kriwaczek, Peter Hammond & H. T. Cory (1986): The British Nationality Act as a Logic Program. Commun. ACM 29(5), pp. 370–386, doi:10.1145/5689.5920.
  16. Songül Tolan, Marius Miron, Emilia Gómez & Carlos Castillo (2019): Why machine learning may lead to unfairness: Evidence from risk assessment for juvenile justice in Catalonia. In: Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp. 83–92, doi:10.1145/3322640.3326705.
  17. Alessandro Traversi (2014): La difesa penale. Tecniche argomentative e oratorie. Giuffrè Editore.
  18. Douglas Walton (2018): Legal Reasoning and Argumentation. In: Handbook of Legal Reasoning and Argumentation. Springer, pp. 47–75, doi:10.1007/978-90-481-9452-0_3.
  19. Hajime Yoshino, S Kagayama, S Ohta, M Kitahara, H Kondoh, M Nakakawaji, K Ishimaru & S Takao (1986): Legal expert system–LES-2. In: 5th Conference on Logic Programming. Springer, pp. 34–45, doi:10.5555/647633.732885.

Comments and questions to: eptcs@eptcs.org
For website issues: webmaster@eptcs.org