References

  1. F. Baader & T. Nipkow (1998): Term Rewriting and All That. Cambridge University Press.
  2. J. Endrullis, J. Waldmann & H. Zantema (2008): Matrix Interpretations for Proving Termination of Term Rewriting. Journal of Automated Reasoning 40(2-3), pp. 195–220. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10817-007-9087-9.
  3. J. Giesl, R. Thiemann & P. Schneider-Kamp (2005): Proving and Disproving Termination of Higher-Order Functions. In: Proc. 5th International Workshop on Frontiers of Combining Systems, LNCS 3717, pp. 216–231. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/11559306_12.
  4. J. Giesl, R. Thiemann, P. Schneider-Kamp & S. Falke (2006): Mechanizing and Improving Dependency Pairs. Journal of Automated Reasoning 37(3), pp. 155–203. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10817-006-9057-7.
  5. B. Gramlich (1995): Abstract Relations between Restricted Termination and Confluence Properties of Rewrite Systems. Fundamenta Informaticae 24(1-2), pp. 3–23.
  6. N. Hirokawa & A. Middeldorp (2005): Automating the Dependency Pair Method. Information and Computation 199(1-2), pp. 172–199. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ic.2004.10.004.
  7. N. Hirokawa & A. Middeldorp (2007): Tyrolean Termination Tool: Techniques and Features. Information and Computation 205(4), pp. 474–511. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ic.2006.08.010.
  8. N. Hirokawa, A. Middeldorp & H. Zankl (2008): Uncurrying for Termination. In: Proc. 15th International Conference on Logic for Programming, Artificial Intelligence and Reasoning, LNCS (LNAI) 5330, pp. 667–681. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89439-1_46.
  9. N. Hirokawa & G. Moser (2008): Automated Complexity Analysis Based on the Dependency Pair Method. In: Proc. 4th International Joint Conference on Automated Reasoning, LNCS (LNAI) 5195, pp. 364–380. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71070-7_32.
  10. D. Hofbauer & C. Lautemann (1989): Termination Proofs and the Length of Derivations. In: Proc. 3rd International Conference on Rewriting Techniques and Applications, LNCS 355, pp. 167–177. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/3-540-51081-8_107.
  11. R. Kennaway, J.W. Klop, M.R. Sleep & F.-J. de Vries (1996): Comparing Curried and Uncurried Rewriting. Journal of Symbolic Computation 21(1), pp. 15–39.
  12. M. Korp, C. Sternagel, H. Zankl & A. Middeldorp (2009): Tyrolean Termination Tool 2. In: Proc. 20th International Conference on Rewriting Techniques and Applications, LNCS 5595, pp. 295–304. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02348-4_21.
  13. G. Moser, A. Schnabl & J. Waldmann (2008): Complexity Analysis of Term Rewriting Based on Matrix and Context Dependent Interpretations. In: Proc. 28th International Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science, LIPIcs 2, pp. 304–315. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2008.1762.
  14. F. Neurauter, H. Zankl & A. Middeldorp (2010): Revisiting Matrix Interpretations for Polynomial Derivational Complexity of Term Rewriting. In: Proc. 17th International Conference on Logic for Programming, Artificial Intelligence and Reasoning, LNCS (ARCoSS) 6397, pp. 550–564. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16242-8_39.
  15. V. van Oostrom (2007): Random Descent. In: Proc. 18th International Conference on Rewriting Techniques and Applications, LNCS 4533, pp. 314–328. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73449-9_24.
  16. M.R.K. Krishna Rao (2000): Some Characteristics of Strong Innermost Normalization. Theoretical Computer Science 239, pp. 141–164. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3975(99)00215-7.
  17. TeReSe (2003): Term Rewriting Systems. Cambridge Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science 55. Cambridge University Press.
  18. J. Waldmann (2010): Polynomially Bounded Matrix Interpretations. In: Proc. 21st International Conference on Rewriting Techniques and Applications, LIPIcs 6, pp. 357–372. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.RTA.2010.357.
  19. H. Zankl & M. Korp (2010): Modular Complexity Analysis via Relative Complexity. In: Proc. 21st International Conference on Rewriting Techniques and Applications, LIPIcs 6, pp. 385–400. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.RTA.2010.385.
  20. H. Zankl & A. Middeldorp (2010): Satisfiability of Non-Linear (Ir)rational Arithmetic. In: Proc. 16th International Conference on Logic for Programming, Artificial Intelligence and Reasoning, LNCS (LNAI) 6355, pp. 481–500.

Comments and questions to: eptcs@eptcs.org
For website issues: webmaster@eptcs.org