References

  1. Clark Barrett, Pascal Fontaine & Cesare Tinelli (2016): The Satisfiability Modulo Theories Library (SMT-LIB). www.SMT-LIB.org.
  2. Clark Barrett, Robert Nieuwenhuis, Albert Oliveras & Cesare Tinelli (2006): Splitting on Demand in SAT Modulo Theories. In: International Conference on Logic for Programming Artificial Intelligence and Reasoning (LPAR'06). Springer, pp. 512–526, doi:10.1007/11916277_35.
  3. Florian Corzilius & Erika Ábrahám (2011): Virtual Substitution for SMT-Solving. In: International Symposium on Fundamentals of Computation Theory (FCT'11). Springer, pp. 360–371, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-22953-4_31.
  4. Florian Corzilius, Gereon Kremer, Sebastian Junges, Stefan Schupp & Erika Ábrahám (2015): SMT-RAT: An Open Source C++ Toolbox for Strategic and Parallel SMT Solving. In: International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing (SAT'15). Springer, pp. 360–368, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24318-4_26.
  5. Scott Cotton (2010): Natural Domain SMT: A Preliminary Assessment. In: International Conference on Formal Modeling and Analysis of Timed Systems (FORMATS'10). Springer, pp. 77–91, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-15297-9_8.
  6. George Bernard Dantzig (1998): Linear Programming and Extensions 48. Princeton University Press, doi:10.1515/9781400884179.
  7. Bruno Dutertre & Leonardo De Moura (2006): Integrating Simplex with DPLL(T). Computer Science Laboratory, SRI International, Tech. Rep. SRI-CSL-06-01.
  8. Julius Farkas (1902): Theorie der einfachen Ungleichungen. Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik (Crelles Journal) 1902(124), pp. 1–27, doi:10.1515/crll.1902.124.1.
  9. Jean Baptiste Joseph Fourier (1827): Analyse des travaux de l’Académie Royale des Sciences pendant l’année 1824. Partie mathématique.
  10. Jean-Louis Imbert (1990): About Redundant Inequalities Generated by Fourier's Algorithm. In: International Conference on Artificial Intelligence: Methodology, Systems, Applications (AIMSA'90). Elsevier, pp. 117–127, doi:10.1016/B978-0-444-88771-9.50019-2.
  11. Jean-Louis Imbert (1993): Fourier's Elimination: Which to Choose?. In: International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (PPCP'93) 1. Citeseer, pp. 117–129.
  12. Rui-Juan Jing, Marc Moreno-Maza & Delaram Talaashrafi (2020): Complexity Estimates for Fourier-Motzkin Elimination. In: Computer Algebra in Scientific Computing (CASC'20). Springer, pp. 282–306, doi:10.1007/978-3-030-60026-6_16.
  13. Leonid Genrikhovich Khachiyan (1980): Polynomial Algorithms in Linear Programming. USSR Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics 20(1), pp. 53–72, doi:10.1016/0041-5553(80)90061-0.
  14. Tim King, Clark Barrett & Bruno Dutertre (2013): Simplex with Sum of Infeasibilities for SMT. In: Formal Methods in Computer-Aided Design (FMCAD'13), pp. 189–196, doi:10.1109/FMCAD.2013.6679409.
  15. Konstantin Korovin, Marek Kosta & Thomas Sturm (2014): Towards Conflict-driven Learning for Virtual Substitution. In: International Workshop on Computer Algebra in Scientific Computing (CASC'14). Springer, pp. 256–270, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10515-4_19.
  16. Konstantin Korovin, Nestan Tsiskaridze & Andrei Voronkov (2009): Conflict Resolution. In: Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP'09). Springer, pp. 509–523, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-04244-7_41.
  17. Konstantin Korovin & Andrei Voronkov (2011): Solving Systems of Linear Inequalities by Bound Propagation. In: Conference on Automated Deduction (CADE'23). Springer, pp. 369–383, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-22438-6_28.
  18. Carlton E. Lemke (1954): The Dual Method of Solving the Linear Programming Problem. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 1(1), pp. 36–47, doi:10.1002/nav.3800010107.
  19. Haokun Li, Bican Xia, Huiying Zhang & Tao Zheng (2021): Choosing the Variable Ordering for Cylindrical Algebraic Decomposition via Exploiting Chordal Structure. In: International Symposium on Symbolic and Algebraic Computation (ISSAC'21). ACM, pp. 281–288, doi:10.1145/3452143.3465520.
  20. Rüdiger Loos & Volker Weispfenning (1993): Applying Linear Quantifier Elimination. The Computer Journal 36(5), pp. 450–462, doi:10.1093/comjnl/36.5.450.
  21. David G Luenberger & Yinyu Ye (1984): Linear and Nonlinear Programming 2nd edition. Springer, doi:10.1007/978-3-030-85450-8.
  22. Kenneth L. McMillan, Andreas Kuehlmann & Mooly Sagiv (2009): Generalizing DPLL to Richer Logics. In: International Conference on Computer Aided Verification (CAV'09). Springer, pp. 462–476, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-02658-4_35.
  23. Theodore Samuel Motzkin (1936): Beiträge zur Theorie der linearen Ungleichungen. Azriel.
  24. Jasper Nalbach, Erika Ábrahám & Gereon Kremer (2021): Extending the Fundamental Theorem of Linear Programming for Strict Inequalities. In: International Symposium on Symbolic and Algebraic Computation (ISSAC'21). ACM, pp. 313–320, doi:10.1145/3452143.3465538.
  25. Jasper Nalbach, Valentin Promies, Erika Ábrahám & Paul Kobialka (2023): FMplex: A Novel Method for Solving Linear Real Arithmetic Problems. ArXiv:2309.03138.
  26. Tobias Nipkow (2008): Linear Quantifier Elimination. In: Internation Joint Conference on Automated Reasoning (IJCAR'08). Springer, pp. 18–33, doi:10.1007/978-3-540-71070-7_3.
  27. Volker Weispfenning (1997): Quantifier Elimination for Real Algebra—the Quadratic Case and Beyond. Applicable Algebra in Engineering, Communication and Computing 8(2), pp. 85–101, doi:10.1007/s002000050055.

Comments and questions to: eptcs@eptcs.org
For website issues: webmaster@eptcs.org