References

  1. Anthony Anjorin & James Cheney (2019): Provenance Meets Bidirectional Transformations. In: 11th International Workshop on Theory and Practice of Provenance (TaPP 2019). USENIX Association, Philadelphia, PA. Available at https://www.usenix.org/conference/tapp2019/presentation/anjorin.
  2. Anthony Anjorin, Karsten Saller, Malte Lochau & Andy Schürr (2014): Modularizing Triple Graph Grammars Using Rule Refinement. In: Stefania Gnesi & Arend Rensink: FASE 2014, LNCS 8411. Springer, pp. 340–354, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-54804-8_24.
  3. Nils Bandener, Christian Soltenborn & Gregor Engels (2010): Extending DMM Behavior Specifications for Visual Execution and Debugging. In: Brian A. Malloy, Steffen Staab & Mark van den Brand: SLE 2010, LNCS 6563. Springer, pp. 357–376, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-19440-5_24.
  4. Dominique Blouin, Alain Plantec, Pierre Dissaux, Frank Singhoff & Jean-Philippe Diguet (2014): Synchronization of Models of Rich Languages with Triple Graph Grammars: An Experience Report. In: Davide Di Ruscio & Dániel Varró: ICMT 2014, LNCS 8568. Springer, pp. 106–121, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-08789-4_8.
  5. Erwan Bousse, Jonathan Corley, Benoît Combemale, Jeffrey G. Gray & Benoit Baudry (2015): Supporting efficient and advanced omniscient debugging for xDSMLs. In: Richard F. Paige, Davide Di Ruscio & Markus Völter: SLE 2015. ACM, pp. 137–148. Available at https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/2814251.2814262.
  6. Loli Burgueño, Jonathan Corley, Nelly Bencomo, Peter J. Clarke, Philippe Collet, Michalis Famelis, Sudipto Ghosh, Martin Gogolla, Joel Greenyer, Esther Guerra, Sahar Kokaly, Alfonso Pierantonio, Julia Rubin & Davide Di Ruscio (2017): MODELS 2017 Satellite Event. CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2019. CEUR-WS.org. Available at http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2019/.
  7. James Cheney, Anthony Finkelstein, Bertram Ludäscher & Stijn Vansummeren (2012): Principles of Provenance (Dagstuhl Seminar 12091). Dagstuhl Reports 2(2), pp. 84–113, doi:10.4230/DagRep.2.2.84.
  8. Jonathan Corley, Brian P. Eddy, Eugene Syriani & Jeff Gray (2017): Efficient and scalable omniscient debugging for model transformations. Software Quality Journal 25(1), pp. 7–48, doi:10.1007/s11219-015-9304-4.
  9. Claudia Ermel, Frank Hermann, Jürgen Gall & Daniel Binanzer (2012): Visual Modeling and Analysis of EMF Model Transformations Based on Triple Graph Grammars. ECEASST 54, doi:10.14279/tuj.eceasst.54.771.
  10. Adel Ferdjoukh & Jean-Marie Mottu (2018): Towards an Automated Fault Localizer while Designing Meta-models. In: Proceedings of MODELS 2018 Workshops, Copenhagen, Denmark, October, 14, 2018, pp. 547–552. Available at http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2245/mdebug_paper_4.pdf.
  11. Holger Giese, Stephan Hildebrandt & Leen Lambers (2014): Bridging the Gap between Formal Semantics and Implementation of Triple Graph Grammars - Ensuring Conformance of Relational Model Transformation Specifications and Implementations. Software and System Modeling 13(1), pp. 273–299, doi:10.1007/s10270-012-0247-y.
  12. Holger Giese & Robert Wagner (2006): Incremental Model Synchronization with Triple Graph Grammars. In: Oscar Nierstrasz, Jon Whittle, David Harel & Gianna Reggio: MoDELS 2006, LNCS 4199. Springer, pp. 543–557, doi:10.1007/11880240_38.
  13. Joel Greenyer & Ekkart Kindler (2010): Comparing Relational Model Transformation Technologies: Implementing Query/View/Transformation with Triple Graph Grammars. Software and System Modeling 9(1), pp. 21–46, doi:10.1007/s10270-009-0121-8.
  14. Stephan Hildebrandt, Leen Lambers, Holger Giese, Dominic Petrick & Ingo Richter (2011): Automatic Conformance Testing of Optimized Triple Graph Grammar Implementations. In: Andy Schürr, Dániel Varró & Gergely Varró: AGTIVE 2011, LNCS 7233. Springer, pp. 238–253, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-34176-2_20.
  15. Maris Jukss, Clark Verbrugge & Hans Vangheluwe (2017): Transformations Debugging Transformations. In: Burgueño, pp. 449–454. Available at http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2019/mdebug_1.pdf.
  16. Lilija Klassen & Robert Wagner (2012): EMorF - A Tool for Model Transformations. ECEASST 54, doi:10.14279/tuj.eceasst.54.768.
  17. A. Krasnogolowy, S. Hildebrandt & S. Wätzoldt (2012): Flexible Debugging of Behavior Models. In: ICIT 2012, Proceedings, pp. 331–336, doi:10.1109/ICIT.2012.6209959.
  18. Yoann Laurent, Reda Bendraou & Marie-Pierre Gervais (2013): Executing and debugging UML models: an fUML extension. In: Sung Y. Shin & José Carlos Maldonado: SAC 2013. ACM, pp. 1095–1102, doi:10.1145/2480362.2480569.
  19. Erhan Leblebici, Anthony Anjorin & Andy Schürr (2014): Developing eMoflon with eMoflon. In: Davide Di Ruscio & Dániel Varró: ICMT 2014, LNCS 8568. Springer, pp. 138–145, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-08789-4_10.
  20. Ricky T. Lindeman, Lennart C. L. Kats & Eelco Visser (2011): Declaratively Defining Domain-Specific Language Debuggers. In: Ewen Denney & Ulrik Pagh Schultz: Proceedings of GPCE 2011, Portland, Oregon, USA, October 22-24, 2011. ACM, pp. 127–136, doi:10.1145/2047862.2047885.
  21. Simon Van Mierlo, Yentl Van Tendeloo & Hans Vangheluwe (2017): Debugging Parallel DEVS. Simulation 93(4), pp. 285–306, doi:10.1177/0037549716658360.
  22. Simon Van Mierlo, Yentl Van Tendeloo & Hans Vangheluwe (2018): A Generalized Stepping Semantics for Model Debugging. In: Proceedings of MODELS 2018 Workshops, Copenhagen, Denmark, October, 14, 2018, pp. 541–546. Available at http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2245/mdebug_paper_3.pdf.
  23. Simon Van Mierlo & Hans Vangheluwe (2017): Debugging Non-determinism: a Petrinets Modelling, Analysis, and Debugging Tool. In: MODELS 2017 Satellite Event, Austin, TX, USA, September, 17, 2017, pp. 460–462. Available at http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2019/mdebug_4.pdf.
  24. Bentley James Oakes, Levi Lucio, Clark Verbrugge & Hans Vangheluwe (2018): Debugging of Model Transformations and Contracts in SyVOLT. In: MODELS 2018 Workshops, Copenhagen, Denmark, October, 14, 2018, pp. 532–537. Available at http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2245/mdebug_paper_1.pdf.
  25. Jan Rieke (2015): Model Consistency Management for Systems Engineering. University of Paderborn. Available at https://digital.ub.uni-paderborn.de/ubpb/urn/urn:nbn:de:hbz:466:2-15597.
  26. Olga Runge, Claudia Ermel & Gabriele Taentzer (2011): AGG 2.0 - New Features for Specifying and Analyzing Algebraic Graph Transformations. In: Andy Schürr, Dániel Varró & Gergely Varró: AGTIVE 2011, Budapest, Hungary, October 4-7, 2011, LNCS 7233. Springer, pp. 81–88, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-34176-2_8.
  27. Johannes Schönböck, Gerti Kappel, Manuel Wimmer, Angelika Kusel, Werner Retschitzegger & Wieland Schwinger (2013): TETRABox - A Generic White-Box Testing Framework for Model Transformations. In: APSEC 2013, pp. 75–82, doi:10.1109/APSEC.2013.21.
  28. Perdita Stevens (2014): Bidirectionally Tolerating Inconsistency: Partial Transformations. In: Stefania Gnesi & Arend Rensink: FASE 2014. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 32–46, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-54804-8_3.
  29. Matthias Tichy, Luis Beaucamp & Stefan Kögel (2017): Towards Debugging the Matching of Henshin Model Transformations Rules. In: Burgueño, pp. 455–456. Available at http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2019/mdebug_2.pdf.
  30. Gergely Varró, Anthony Anjorin & Andy Schürr (2012): Unification of Compiled and Interpreter-Based Pattern Matching Techniques. In: Antonio Vallecillo, Juha-Pekka Tolvanen, Ekkart Kindler, Harald Störrle & Dimitrios S. Kolovos: ECMFA 2012, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark, July 2-5, 2012. Proceedings, LNCS 7349. Springer, pp. 368–383, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-31491-9_28.
  31. Nils Weidmann, Anthony Anjorin, Lars Fritsche, Gergely Varró, Andy Schürr & Erhan Leblebici (2019): Incremental Bidirectional Model Transformation with eMoflon::IBeX. In: James Cheney & Hsiang-Shang Ko: Bx@PLW 2019, CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2355. CEUR-WS.org, pp. 45–55. Available at http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2355/paper4.pdf.

Comments and questions to: eptcs@eptcs.org
For website issues: webmaster@eptcs.org