References

  1. B. Abu Radi & O. Kupferman (2019): Minimizing GFG Transition-Based Automata. In: Proc. 46th Int. Colloq. on Automata, Languages, and Programming, LIPIcs 132. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik, pp. 100:1–100:16, doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2019.100.
  2. M. Bagnol & D. Kuperberg (2018): Büchi Good-for-Games Automata Are Efficiently Recognizable. In: Proc. 38th Conf. on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science, LIPIcs 122. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik, pp. 16:1–16:14, doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2018.16.
  3. U. Boker, D. Kuperberg, O. Kupferman & M. Skrzypczak (2013): Nondeterminism in the Presence of a Diverse or Unknown Future. In: ICALP (2), Lecture Notes in Computer Science 7966. Springer, pp. 89–100, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-39212-2_11.
  4. U. Boker, O. Kupferman & M. Skrzypczak (2017): How Deterministic are Good-For-Games Automata?. In: Proc. 37th Conf. on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science, Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs) 93, pp. 18:1–18:14, doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2017.18.
  5. J.R. Büchi (1962): On a Decision Method in Restricted Second Order Arithmetic. In: Proc. Int. Congress on Logic, Method, and Philosophy of Science. 1960. Stanford University Press, pp. 1–12.
  6. Th. Colcombet (2009): The theory of stabilisation monoids and regular cost functions. In: Proc. 36th Int. Colloq. on Automata, Languages, and Programming, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 5556. Springer, pp. 139–150, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-02930-1_12.
  7. A. Duret-Lutz, A. Lewkowicz, A. Fauchille, Th. Michaud, E. Renault & L. Xu (2016): Spot 2.0 — a framework for LTL and ω-automata manipulation. In: 14th Int. Symp. on Automated Technology for Verification and Analysis, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 9938. Springer, pp. 122–129, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46520-3_8.
  8. D. Giannakopoulou & F. Lerda (2002): From States to Transitions: Improving Translation of LTL Formulae to Büchi Automata. In: Proc. 22nd International Conference on Formal Techniques for Networked and Distributed Systems, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2529. Springer, pp. 308–326, doi:10.1007/3-540-36135-9_20.
  9. T.A. Henzinger, O. Kupferman & S. Rajamani (2002): Fair simulation. Information and Computation 173(1), pp. 64–81, doi:10.1006/inco.2001.3085.
  10. T.A. Henzinger & N. Piterman (2006): Solving Games without Determinization. In: Proc. 15th Annual Conf. of the European Association for Computer Science Logic, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4207. Springer, pp. 394–410, doi:10.1007/11874683_26.
  11. J.E. Hopcroft (1971): An n ologn algorithm for minimizing the states in a finite automaton. In: Z. Kohavi: The Theory of Machines and Computations. Academic Press, pp. 189–196, doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-417750-5.50022-1.
  12. D. Kuperberg & M. Skrzypczak (2015): On Determinisation of Good-for-Games Automata. In: Proc. 42nd Int. Colloq. on Automata, Languages, and Programming, pp. 299–310, doi:10.1007/978-3-662-47666-6_24.
  13. O. Kupferman (2015): Automata Theory and Model Checking. Handbook of Theoretical Computer Science.
  14. O. Kupferman, S. Safra & M.Y. Vardi (2006): Relating word and tree automata. Ann. Pure Appl. Logic 138(1-3), pp. 126–146, doi:10.1016/j.apal.2005.06.009.
  15. K. Lehtinen & M. Zimmermann (2020): Good-for-games ω-Pushdown Automata. In: Proc. 35th IEEE Symp. on Logic in Computer Science, pp. 689–702, doi:10.1145/3373718.3394737.
  16. W. Li, Sh. Kan & Z. Huang (2017): A Better Translation From LTL to Transition-Based Generalized Büchi Automata. IEEE Access 5, pp. 27081–27090, doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2773123.
  17. G. Morgenstern (2003): Expressiveness results at the bottom of the ω-regular hierarchy. M.Sc. Thesis, The Hebrew University.
  18. J. Myhill (1957): Finite automata and the representation of events. Technical Report WADD TR-57-624, pages 112–137. Wright Patterson AFB, Ohio.
  19. A. Nerode (1958): Linear Automaton Transformations. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 9(4), pp. 541–544, doi:10.2307/2033204.
  20. D. Niwinski & I. Walukiewicz (1998): Relating hierarchies of word and tree automata. In: Proc. 15th Symp. on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1373. Springer, pp. 320–331, doi:10.1007/BFb0028571.
  21. S. Schewe (2010): Beyond Hyper-Minimisation—Minimising DBAs and DPAs is NP-Complete. In: Proc. 30th Conf. on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science, Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs) 8, pp. 400–411, doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2010.400.
  22. S. Schewe (2020): Minimising Good-for-Games automata is NP complete. CoRR abs/2003.11979.
  23. S. Sickert, J. Esparza, S. Jaax & J. Křetínský (2016): Limit-Deterministic Büchi Automata for Linear Temporal Logic. In: Proc. 28th Int. Conf. on Computer Aided Verification, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 9780. Springer, pp. 312–332, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-41540-6_17.
  24. R.E. Tarjan (1972): Depth first search and linear graph algorithms. SIAM Journal of Computing 1(2), pp. 146–160, doi:10.1137/0201010.
  25. M.Y. Vardi & P. Wolper (1994): Reasoning about Infinite Computations. Information and Computation 115(1), pp. 1–37, doi:10.1006/inco.1994.1092.

Comments and questions to: eptcs@eptcs.org
For website issues: webmaster@eptcs.org