Samson Abramsky, Rui Soares Barbosa & Shane Mansfield (2017):
Contextual Fraction as a Measure of Contextuality.
Physical Review Letter 119,
pp. 050504,
doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.050504.
Samson Abramsky & Adam Brandenburger (2011):
The sheaf-theoretic structure of non-locality and contextuality.
New Journal of Physics 13(11),
pp. 113036,
doi:10.1088/1367-2630/13/11/113036.
Janet Anders & Dan E. Browne (2009):
Computational Power of Correlations.
Physical Review Letter 102,
pp. 050502,
doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.050502.
Marco Baroni, Raffaella Bernardi & Roberto Zamparelli (2014):
Frege in Space: A Program for Compositional Distributional Semantics 9,
pp. 241–346,
doi:10.33011/lilt.v9i.1321.
John S. Bell (1964):
On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox.
Physics Physique Fizika 1,
pp. 195–200,
doi:10.1103/PhysicsPhysiqueFizika.1.195.
Bob Coecke, Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh & Stephen Clark (2010):
Mathematical Foundations for a Compositional Distributional Model of Meaning,
doi:10.48550/arXiv.1003.4394.
Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee & Kristina Toutanova (2019):
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding.
In: Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers),
Minneapolis, Minnesota,
pp. 4171–4186,
doi:10.18653/v1/N19-1423.
Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov, Janne V. Kujala, Víctor H. Cervantes, Ru Zhang & Matt Jones (2016):
On contextuality in behavioural data.
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 374(2068),
pp. 20150234,
doi:10.1098/rsta.2015.0234.
Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky & Nathan Rosen (1935):
Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?.
Phys. Rev. 47,
pp. 777–780,
doi:10.1103/PhysRev.47.777.
John R Firth (1957):
A synopsis of linguistic theory, 1930-1955.
Studies in linguistic analysis.
M. Howard, J. Wallman, V. Veitch & J. Emerson (2014):
Contextuality supplies the 'magic' for quantum computation.
Nature 510(7505),
pp. 351–355,
doi:10.1038/nature13460.
ArXiv:1401.4174.
Hector J. Levesque, Ernest Davis & Leora Morgenstern (2012):
The Winograd Schema Challenge.
In: Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning,
KR'12.
AAAI Press,
pp. 552–561.
Robin Lorenz, Anna Pearson, Konstantinos Meichanetzidis, Dimitri Kartsaklis & Bob Coecke (2021):
QNLP in Practice: Running Compositional Models of Meaning on a Quantum Computer,
doi:10.48550/arXiv.2102.12846.
S. Mansfield & E. Kashefi (2018):
Quantum Advantage from Sequential-Transformation Contextuality.
Physical Review Letters 121(23),
pp. 1–8,
doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.230401.
ArXiv:1801.08150.
Damian Markham Pierre-Emmanuel Emariau, Shane Mansfield (2022):
Corrected Bell and Non-Contextuality Inequalities for Realistic Experiments.
in preparation.
R. Raussendorf (2013):
Contextuality in measurement-based quantum computation.
Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics 88(2),
pp. 1–7,
doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.88.022322.
ArXiv:0907.5449.
Daphne Wang, Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh, Samson Abramsky & Victor Cervantes (2021):
On the Quantum-like Contextuality of Ambiguous Phrases.
In: Proceedings of the 2021 Workshop on Semantic Spaces at the Intersection of NLP, Physics, and Cognitive Science (SemSpace).
Association for Computational Linguistics,
Groningen, The Netherlands,
pp. 42–52.
Daphne Wang, Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh, Samson Abramsky & Víctor H. Cervantes (2021):
Analysing Ambiguous Nouns and Verbs with Quantum Contextuality Tools.
Journal of Cognitive Science 22(3),
pp. 391–420,
doi:10.17791/jcs.2021.22.3.391.
eptcs@eptcs.org