References

  1. Esma Balkir, Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh & Bob Coecke (2016): Distributional Sentence Entailment Using Density Matrices. In: Mohammad Taghi Hajiaghayi & Mohammad Reza Mousavi: Topics in Theoretical Computer Science. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 1–22, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28678-5_1.
  2. Dea Bankova, Bob Coecke, Martha Lewis & Dan Marsden (2019): Graded hyponymy for compositional distributional semantics. Journal of Language Modelling 6(2), pp. 225–260, doi:10.15398/jlm.v6i2.230.
  3. William Blacoe, Elham Kashefi & Mirella Lapata (2013): A Quantum-Theoretic Approach to Distributional Semantics. In: Proceedings of the 2013 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. Association for Computational Linguistics, Atlanta, Georgia, pp. 847–857. Available at https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/N13-1105.
  4. Joe Bolt, Bob Coecke, Fabrizio Genovese, Martha Lewis, Dan Marsden & Robin Piedeleu (2019): Interacting Conceptual Spaces I: Grammatical Composition of Concepts, pp. 151–181. Springer International Publishing, Cham, doi:10.1007/978-3-030-12800-5_9.
  5. Bob Coecke (2020): The Mathematics of Text Structure. ArXiv:1904.03478.
  6. Bob Coecke & Martha Lewis (2016): A Compositional Explanation of the `Pet Fish' Phenomenon. In: Harald Atmanspacher, Thomas Filk & Emmanuel Pothos: Quantum Interaction. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 179–192, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28675-4_14.
  7. Bob Coecke & Konstantinos Meichanetzidis (2020): Meaning updating of density matrices. FLAP 7, pp. 745–770. Available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.00862.
  8. Bob Coecke, Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh & Stephen Clark (2010): Mathematical foundations for a compositional distributional model of meaning. Linguistic Analysis 36, pp. 345–384. Available at https://arxiv.org/abs/1003.4394.
  9. Gemma De las Cuevas, Andreas Klingler, Martha Lewis & Tim Netzer (2020): Cats climb entails mammals move: preserving hyponymy in compositional distributional semantics. CoRR abs/2005.14134. ArXiv:2005.14134.
  10. Jonathan St B. T. Evans (1989): Bias in human reasoning: Causes and consequences.. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  11. Jonathan St B. T. Evans, John Clibbens & Benjamin Rood (1996): The Role of Implicit and Explicit Negation in Conditional Reasoning Bias. Journal of Memory and Language 35, pp. 392–409, doi:10.1006/jmla.1996.0022.
  12. Christiane Fellbaum (1998): WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database, doi:10.7551/mitpress/7287.001.0001. Available at https://wordnet.princeton.edu/.
  13. Marti A. Hearst (1992): Automatic Acquisition of Hyponyms from Large Text Corpora. In: Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Computational Linguistics - Volume 2, COLING '92. Association for Computational Linguistics, USA, pp. 539–545, doi:10.3115/992133.992154.
  14. Laurence R. Horn & Heinrich Wansing (2020): Negation. In: Edward N. Zalta: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Spring 2020 edition. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
  15. Ray S. Jackendoff (1969): An Interpretive Theory of Negation. Foundations of Language 5(2), pp. 218–241, doi:10.2307/25000377.
  16. Hans Kamp & Uwe Reyle (2013): From discourse to logic: Introduction to modeltheoretic semantics of natural language, formal logic and discourse representation theory 42. Springer Science & Business Media.
  17. Dimitri Kartsaklis & Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh (2013): Prior Disambiguation of Word Tensors for Constructing Sentence Vectors. In: Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Association for Computational Linguistics, Seattle, Washington, USA, pp. 1590–1601. Available at https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/D13-1166.
  18. Dimitri Kartsaklis & Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh (2016): A Compositional Distributional Inclusion Hypothesis. In: Maxime Amblard, Philippe de Groote, Sylvain Pogodalla & Christian Retoré: Logical Aspects of Computational Linguistics. Celebrating 20 Years of LACL (1996–2016). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 116–133, doi:10.1007/978-3-662-53826-5_8.
  19. Dimitri Kartsaklis & Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh (2016): Distributional Inclusion Hypothesis for Tensor-based Composition. In: Proceedings of COLING 2016, the 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers. The COLING 2016 Organizing Committee, Osaka, Japan, pp. 2849–2860. Available at https://aclanthology.org/C16-1268.
  20. Dimitri Kartsaklis, Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh & Stephen Pulman (2013): Separating Disambiguation from Composition in Distributional Semantics. In: Proceedings of the Seventeenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning. Association for Computational Linguistics, Sofia, Bulgaria, pp. 114–123. Available at https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W13-3513.
  21. Edward S Klima (1964): Negation in English. In: J. A. Fodor & J. J. Katz: The Structure of Language. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, pp. 246–323.
  22. Germán Kruszewski, Denis Paperno, Raffaella Bernardi & Marco Baroni (2016): There is no logical negation here, but there are alternatives: Modeling conversational negation with distributional semantics. Computational Linguistics 42(4), pp. 637–660, doi:10.1162/COLI_a_00262.
  23. Joachim Lambek (2007): From Word to Sentence: A Pregroup Analysis of the Object Pronoun Who(m). Journal of Logic, Language, and Information 16(3), pp. 303–323, doi:10.1007/s10849-006-9035-9.
  24. Edward N. Lee (1972): Plato on Negation and Not-Being in the Sophist. The Philosophical Review 81(3), pp. 267–304, doi:10.2307/2184327.
  25. Martha Lewis (2019): Compositional Hyponymy with Positive Operators. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing (RANLP 2019). INCOMA Ltd., Varna, Bulgaria, pp. 638–647, doi:10.26615/978-954-452-056-4_075.
  26. Martha Lewis (2020): Towards logical negation for compositional distributional semantics. IfCoLoG Journal of Logics and their Applications 7(3). Available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.04929.
  27. Francois Meyer & Martha Lewis (2020): Modelling Lexical Ambiguity with Density Matrices. In: Proceedings of the 24th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning. Association for Computational Linguistics, Online, pp. 276–290, doi:10.18653/v1/2020.conll-1.21. Available at https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/2020.conll-1.21.
  28. Saif M. Mohammad, Bonnie J. Dorr, Graeme Hirst & Peter D. Turney (2013): Computing Lexical Contrast. Computational Linguistics 39(3), pp. 555–590, doi:10.1162/COLI_a_00143.
  29. Mike Oaksford (2002): Contrast classes and matching bias as explanations of the effects of negation on conditional reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning 8(2), pp. 135–151, doi:10.1080/13546780143000170.
  30. Mike Oaksford & Keith Stenning (1992): Reasoning with conditionals containing negated constituents.. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 18(4), pp. 835, doi:10.1037/0278-7393.18.4.835.
  31. Robin Piedeleu, Dimitri Kartsaklis, Bob Coecke & Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh (2015): Open system categorical quantum semantics in natural language processing. arXiv preprint arXiv:1502.00831.
  32. Jérôme Prado & Ira Noveck (2006): How reaction time measures elucidate the matching bias and the way negations are processed. Thinking & Reasoning - THINK REASONING 12, pp. 309–328, doi:10.1080/13546780500371241.
  33. Benjamin Rodatz, Razin Shaikh & Lia Yeh (2021): Conversational Negation using Worldly Context in Compositional Distributional Semantics. In: Proceedings of the 2021 Workshop on Semantic Spaces at the Intersection of NLP, Physics, and Cognitive Science (SemSpace). Association for Computational Linguistics, Groningen, The Netherlands, pp. 53–65. Available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.05748.
  34. Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh, Dimitri Kartsaklis & Esma Balkır (2018): Sentence entailment in compositional distributional semantics. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 82(4), pp. 189–218, doi:10.1007/s10472-017-9570-x.
  35. Peter Selinger (2007): Dagger Compact Closed Categories and Completely Positive Maps: (Extended Abstract). Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 170, pp. 139–163, doi:10.1016/j.entcs.2006.12.018. Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Quantum Programming Languages (QPL 2005).
  36. Dominic Widdows & Stanley Peters (2003): Word vectors and quantum logic: Experiments with negation and disjunction. Mathematics of language 8(141-154). Available at https://www.puttypeg.net/papers/quantum-senses.pdf.
Comments and questions to: eptcs@eptcs.org
For website issues: webmaster@eptcs.org